Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
101. Well said. Remember when Seymour Hersh had a job at The New Yorker?
Thu Dec 31, 2015, 10:34 PM
Dec 2015

The story follows one Richard (PNAC/Another Pearl Harbor) Perle. Just after September 11 and the Washington-Wall Street axis of war profiteering was heating up, Perle hit up Adnan (Iran-Contra/BCCI) Khashoggi for $100 million to make his new "Trireme Partnerships" private disaster investment bank take off.



Khashoggi's money would help launch the Carlyle Group-like investment group Perle founded. The petromoney was not for arms, directly. It was for investing in companies that were going to be making a killing off of homeland security related areas.

Interesting selling point: Perle already had secured financing from in from Boeing and some other bigwigs like Henry Kissinger.

One of the most important articles The New Yorker ever published:



Lunch with the Chairman

by Seymour M. Hersh
17 March 2003

At the peak of his deal-making activities, in the nineteen-seventies, the Saudi-born businessman Adnan Khashoggi brokered billions of dollars in arms and aircraft sales for the Saudi royal family, earning hundreds of millions in commissions and fees. Though never convicted of wrongdoing, he was repeatedly involved in disputes with federal prosecutors and with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and in recent years he has been in litigation in Thailand and Los Angeles, among other places, concerning allegations of stock manipulation and fraud. During the Reagan Administration, Khashoggi was one of the middlemen between Oliver North, in the White House, and the mullahs in Iran in what became known as the Iran-Contra scandal. Khashoggi subsequently claimed that he lost ten million dollars that he had put up to obtain embargoed weapons for Iran which were to be bartered (with Presidential approval) for American hostages. The scandals of those times seemed to feed off each other: a congressional investigation revealed that Khashoggi had borrowed much of the money for the weapons from the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (B.C.C.I.), whose collapse, in 1991, defrauded thousands of depositors and led to years of inquiry and litigation.

Khashoggi is still brokering. In January of this year, he arranged a private lunch, in France, to bring together Harb Saleh al-Zuhair, a Saudi industrialist whose family fortune includes extensive holdings in construction, electronics, and engineering companies throughout the Middle East, and Richard N. Perle, the chairman of the Defense Policy Board, who is one of the most outspoken and influential American advocates of war with Iraq.

The Defense Policy Board is a Defense Department advisory group composed primarily of highly respected former government officials, retired military officers, and academics. Its members, who serve without pay, include former national-security advisers, Secretaries of Defense, and heads of the C.I.A. The board meets several times a year at the Pentagon to review and assess the country’s strategic defense policies.

Perle is also a managing partner in a venture-capital company called Trireme Partners L.P., which was registered in November, 2001, in Delaware. Trireme’s main business, according to a two-page letter that one of its representatives sent to Khashoggi last November, is to invest in companies dealing in technology, goods, and services that are of value to homeland security and defense. The letter argued that the fear of terrorism would increase the demand for such products in Europe and in countries like Saudi Arabia and Singapore.

CONTINUED...

http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2003/03/17/030317fa_fact



A bit on the new TRIREME business...



At Hollinger, Big Perks in A Small World

By Steven Pearlstein
Wednesday, November 19, 2003; Page E01

It's amazing the coincidences you find digging into Hollinger International, the publishing empire that includes Chicago's Sun-Times and London's Daily Telegraph and is quickly slipping from Conrad Black's control.

Let's start with the board of directors, which includes Barbara Amiel, Conrad's wife, whose right-wing rants have managed to find an outlet in Hollinger publications.

And there's Washington superhawk Richard Perle, who heads Hollinger Digital, the company's venture capital arm. Seems that Hollinger Digital put $2.5 million in a company called Trireme Partners, which aims to cash in on the big military and homeland security buildup. As luck would have it, Trireme's managing partner is none other than . . . Richard Perle.

Perle, of course, has been pushing hard for just such a military buildup from his other perch at the Pentagon's secretive and influential Defense Policy Board, where there are a number of other Friends of Hollinger.

CONTINUED (archived nowadays)...

http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-309818.html



Where's Justice? Where's Democracy? Who cares!? The to-bomb list grows longer every day. It's why I keep bringing up Dallas and the Flock shifts discussion to the trivial.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It's a conspiracy. Act_of_Reparation Dec 2015 #1
That's what Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler, USMC (ret.) wrote. Octafish Dec 2015 #6
I'm not psychic so much as you are predictable. Act_of_Reparation Dec 2015 #18
You missed my point, then. Octafish Dec 2015 #19
I think the arc of history bends towards chaos. Act_of_Reparation Dec 2015 #22
You got it. You know who else really understands ''Realpolitik''? Octafish Dec 2015 #51
Game, Set and Match. CanSocDem Dec 2015 #65
Yeah, that's fascinating. Act_of_Reparation Dec 2015 #98
Maybe tied to the JFK shooting?? nt Logical Dec 2015 #84
The same people - those who profit - work for war. Octafish Dec 2015 #88
You're not able to answer the question. DisgustipatedinCA Dec 2015 #78
No question was asked. Act_of_Reparation Dec 2015 #95
So why don't you follow your own advice? Octafish Jan 2016 #121
Sorry, I may get an alert for this but it just seems to me 7wo7rees Jan 2016 #129
I guess you haven't an answer either. . . .n/t annabanana Dec 2015 #87
As a rule, I only provide answers to questions asked in earnest. Act_of_Reparation Dec 2015 #96
Please provide an answer to the question posed in the OP: Who are we fighting in Afganistan. nt ChisolmTrailDem Jan 2016 #128
We're fighting the POPPY MANUFACTURES....WE WANT TO CONTROL THE HEROIN TRADE AS ALWAYS! ViseGrip Jan 2016 #126
. Wilms Dec 2015 #2
You converted me into a Monkees fan. Octafish Dec 2015 #11
from the Ministry of Truth? Downwinder Dec 2015 #20
We've always been at pre-emptive war with Eurasia. Octafish Dec 2015 #21
Did Shrub spill the beans with his comment Downwinder Dec 2015 #27
Adam Curtis doc for the BBC... GreatGazoo Dec 2015 #40
Historical note: I think the comment to which you allude came, non from Shrub, but from KingCharlemagne Dec 2015 #92
Brown people mwrguy Dec 2015 #3
Brown people are ottomanitacally enemy. Octafish Dec 2015 #12
You know whose side we're on in Afghanistan? The "brown people", as you beautifully put it muriel_volestrangler Dec 2015 #23
Which bad guys? Octafish Dec 2015 #33
Your memory is apalling muriel_volestrangler Dec 2015 #34
I wish I could forget the time Obama repeated Bush line Taliban never offered up bin laden. Octafish Dec 2015 #61
This is correct. n/t Ghost Dog Dec 2015 #67
Waste of time. Rex Dec 2015 #38
You should see what they're planning for the Home Front. Octafish Dec 2015 #62
A lot of Afghans don't like their government. CJCRANE Dec 2015 #76
While its most certainly a position of some in the right... Docreed2003 Dec 2015 #35
The Brown People bigwillq Dec 2015 #4
Why would Obama fight people because they are brown?? GummyBearz Dec 2015 #5
Because they're terrarists bigwillq Dec 2015 #7
We have a commander in chief who knows that is not true, what a ridiculous thing to say GummyBearz Dec 2015 #9
I was being sarcastic (kind of) bigwillq Dec 2015 #24
They are soooo ungrateful. Octafish Dec 2015 #13
You know, the bad guys gratuitous Dec 2015 #8
Speaking of money... You know who's getting RICH off the war on ISIS? Octafish Dec 2015 #14
Sibel Edmonds knew, so she was fired and slapped with a gag order when she tried to tell. nt tblue37 Jan 2016 #120
Can you handle the truth? It's to OWN THE LAND. GOOGLE "Mineral wealth of Afghanistan"!!!! WinkyDink Dec 2015 #10
Trillions for Billionaires! Octafish Dec 2015 #17
Great post, Octafish. nt. polly7 Dec 2015 #43
And yet there are millions of americans who think that 3000 American lives in NYC would mean WinkyDink Jan 2016 #130
+1000. nt. polly7 Dec 2015 #44
and cell phones klyon Dec 2015 #70
Everyone wants Afghanistan for the location and resources KentuckyWoman Dec 2015 #15
Bush, Enron, UNOCAL and the Taliban Octafish Dec 2015 #29
Some combination of scary bogeymen. We lost. Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2015 #16
I was hoping we would have closed the books back in 2009. Octafish Dec 2015 #31
WHY EVIL DOERS, that's who, SIR! bobthedrummer Dec 2015 #25
He may be the only uncorrupted guy in that whole bunch. Octafish Dec 2015 #52
Allowing our favored industries first dibs at a trillion dollar's worth of raw materials arcane1 Dec 2015 #26
That is a lot of awesome. Plus, the location! Octafish Dec 2015 #58
^^This, and of course to save face johnnypanic42 Dec 2015 #77
We're fighting FOR heroin. Rich people must get richer, after all. nt valerief Dec 2015 #28
Same Ol' World Odor Octafish Dec 2015 #64
The Nazis, cause they bombed Pearl Harbor. Crack a book for Pete's sake. Glassunion Dec 2015 #30
The American Dream Octafish Dec 2015 #66
Everybody Matrosov Dec 2015 #32
We need more guns to protect our ideals. Octafish Dec 2015 #94
Well we can eliminate the producers of heroin malaise Dec 2015 #36
The Politics of Afghan Opium (2002) Octafish Dec 2015 #104
Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh! malaise Jan 2016 #110
Eurasia. Or was that Eastasia? PowerToThePeople Dec 2015 #37
Got a box of rocks to boot for ever... Octafish Jan 2016 #105
Eastasia. We have always been at war with Eastasia. Fozzledick Jan 2016 #122
The M$M likes this war, not enough are complaining and the ones that do Rex Dec 2015 #39
Maybe the big enemy isn't overseas at all. Octafish Jan 2016 #112
"Somebody" is making a lot of money off their poppy crops n/t Holly_Hobby Dec 2015 #41
The Real ''Surge'' Octafish Jan 2016 #127
Check the checklist ... Scuba Dec 2015 #42
The US invasion of Afghanistan was justified and fully supported by many allies. tabasco Dec 2015 #46
Sorry, but 9/11 should have been treated like the crime it was. Scuba Dec 2015 #47
That's like, your opinion, man. n/t tabasco Dec 2015 #49
Did you note that we're still wasting lives and money in Afghanistan, 15 years later? Scuba Dec 2015 #50
Er uh...er uh...well that is besides the point! Rex Dec 2015 #54
Thanks to Bush's illegal invasion of Iraq. tabasco Dec 2015 #59
Yeah and millions of us agree with it, man. Rex Dec 2015 #53
There's like 300 million in the US alone. tabasco Dec 2015 #60
"but 9/11 should have been treated like the crime it was" EX500rider Dec 2015 #68
If that's the only way you can think of to apprehend criminals you're not very thoughtful. Scuba Dec 2015 #71
Speaking of not very thoughtful... EX500rider Dec 2015 #72
"Beef up " means to add to. And legitimizing the CRIME by ... Scuba Dec 2015 #74
So you think law enforcement... EX500rider Dec 2015 #75
Ever hear of a SWAT team? 'Cause that's what took out Bin Laden. Scuba Dec 2015 #79
Yeah he was hiding in a house with a few guards.. EX500rider Dec 2015 #80
Hey if you want to defend one of the worst foreign policy blunders in American history, be my guest. Scuba Dec 2015 #81
Taking down the Taliban is the worst blunder in YOUR opinion... EX500rider Dec 2015 #82
In case you haven't noticed, we haven't taken them down, 15 years and a trillion dollars later. Scuba Dec 2015 #83
Actually we did...they are no longer the government of Afghanistan.. EX500rider Dec 2015 #86
The difference between a SWAT team and a US tier one military unit.. TipTok Dec 2015 #90
Seal Team Six is no fucking SWAT Team. Your ignorance of basic tactical msanthrope Jan 2016 #109
Condescension works great for building animus among the lower ranks. Octafish Jan 2016 #124
Al Qaeda was, like, 50 guys total truebluegreen Dec 2015 #103
Maybe you missed the African Embassy bombings... EX500rider Jan 2016 #108
Wikipedia? Srsly? truebluegreen Jan 2016 #119
Which law enforcement agency would you have sent? TipTok Dec 2015 #89
Historical note: the Taliban agreed to extradite bin Laden to a court with international KingCharlemagne Dec 2015 #93
If by "we" you mean NATO and Afghan Army forces tabasco Dec 2015 #45
So 15 years later and why are we still there? How many decades do we need to be there? Rex Dec 2015 #55
We are saving their mineral resources and poppies JEB Dec 2015 #48
Strange Victory Octafish Dec 2015 #102
They are just pulling themselves up by their bootstraps. JEB Jan 2016 #113
We are not fighting, we are making sure the opium drug lords have security from Rex Dec 2015 #56
Well said. Remember when Seymour Hersh had a job at The New Yorker? Octafish Dec 2015 #101
Who are we NOT fighting in Afghanistan? Wounded Bear Dec 2015 #57
Germany? Octafish Jan 2016 #114
Bad people. Don't you like cheap oil? TBF Dec 2015 #63
All the oil in the world won't bring back a lost life. Octafish Jan 2016 #115
... TBF Jan 2016 #116
We are fighting the people that assassinated JFK. kwassa Dec 2015 #69
''Money trumps peace.'' -- appointed pretzeldent George Walker Bush, Feb. 14, 2007 Octafish Dec 2015 #73
The corporate media seems to conveniently forget to report a lot of things. Rex Dec 2015 #85
That seems like synchronicity, so much serendipity. Octafish Dec 2015 #91
This has been a year of some interesting books, don't you think? MrMickeysMom Dec 2015 #99
Media Blackout shows it is Great Book. Octafish Dec 2015 #100
And it's 1-2-3, what are we fighting for? Don't ask me, I don't KingCharlemagne Dec 2015 #97
One Definition of Insanity Octafish Jan 2016 #123
;-) WinkyDink Jan 2016 #131
Kaos... madinmaryland Jan 2016 #106
A Strategy of Tension Octafish Jan 2016 #125
And what are we fighting for? bluedigger Jan 2016 #107
He's a Drug Store Truck Drivin' Man Octafish Jan 2016 #118
We are fighting ourselves. raouldukelives Jan 2016 #111
Operation CYCLONE Octafish Jan 2016 #117
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Who are we fighting in Af...»Reply #101