Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
29. These days we get to enjoy the politico-economic wisdom of Tyler Cowen.
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 01:37 PM
Jan 2016

Scholar. Sage. Pro-business. Big ideas of how to make a killing. Heh heh heh.



The Pitfalls of Peace

The Lack of Major Wars May Be Hurting Economic Growth

Tyler Cowen
The New York Times, JUNE 13, 2014

The continuing slowness of economic growth in high-income economies has prompted soul-searching among economists. They have looked to weak demand, rising inequality, Chinese competition, over-regulation, inadequate infrastructure and an exhaustion of new technological ideas as possible culprits.

An additional explanation of slow growth is now receiving attention, however. It is the persistence and expectation of peace.

The world just hasn’t had that much warfare lately, at least not by historical standards. Some of the recent headlines about Iraq or South Sudan make our world sound like a very bloody place, but today’s casualties pale in light of the tens of millions of people killed in the two world wars in the first half of the 20th century. Even the Vietnam War had many more deaths than any recent war involving an affluent country.

Counterintuitive though it may sound, the greater peacefulness of the world may make the attainment of higher rates of economic growth less urgent and thus less likely. This view does not claim that fighting wars improves economies, as of course the actual conflict brings death and destruction. The claim is also distinct from the Keynesian argument that preparing for war lifts government spending and puts people to work. Rather, the very possibility of war focuses the attention of governments on getting some basic decisions right — whether investing in science or simply liberalizing the economy. Such focus ends up improving a nation’s longer-run prospects.

It may seem repugnant to find a positive side to war in this regard, but a look at American history suggests we cannot dismiss the idea so easily. Fundamental innovations such as nuclear power, the computer and the modern aircraft were all pushed along by an American government eager to defeat the Axis powers or, later, to win the Cold War. The Internet was initially designed to help this country withstand a nuclear exchange, and Silicon Valley had its origins with military contracting, not today’s entrepreneurial social media start-ups. The Soviet launch of the Sputnik satellite spurred American interest in science and technology, to the benefit of later economic growth.

War brings an urgency that governments otherwise fail to summon. For instance, the Manhattan Project took six years to produce a working atomic bomb, starting from virtually nothing, and at its peak consumed 0.4 percent of American economic output. It is hard to imagine a comparably speedy and decisive achievement these days.

SNIP...

Living in a largely peaceful world with 2 percent G.D.P. growth has some big advantages that you don’t get with 4 percent growth and many more war deaths. Economic stasis may not feel very impressive, but it’s something our ancestors never quite managed to pull off. The real questions are whether we can do any better, and whether the recent prevalence of peace is a mere temporary bubble just waiting to be burst.

Tyler Cowen is a professor of economics at George Mason University.

SOURCE: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/14/upshot/the-lack-of-major-wars-may-be-hurting-economic-growth.html?_r=0



The guy seems to specialize in Big Ticket themes:

Just when I thought, maybe, we had reached bottom and were ready to bounce up -- I discovered there may be no bottom -- for me and the large part of the 99-percent.



Economist Tyler Cowen of George Mason University has seen the future and it looks bleak for most of us. Thankfully, those at the top, though, are in for some more good times. He spoke about his findings with NPR's Steve Inskeep. I almost dropped my smartphone into my coffee while texting during rush hour, listening to the report this morning, I was so steamed.



Tired Of Inequality? One Economist Says It'll Only Get Worse

by NPR STAFF
September 12, 2013 3:05 AM

Economist Tyler Cowen has some advice for what to do about America's income inequality: Get used to it. In his latest book, Average Is Over, Cowen lays out his prediction for where the U.S. economy is heading, like it or not:

"I think we'll see a thinning out of the middle class," he tells NPR's Steve Inskeep. "We'll see a lot of individuals rising up to much greater wealth. And we'll also see more individuals clustering in a kind of lower-middle class existence."

It's a radical change from the America of 40 or 50 years ago. Cowen believes the wealthy will become more numerous, and even more powerful. The elderly will hold on to their benefits ... the young, not so much. Millions of people who might have expected a middle class existence may have to aspire to something else.

SNIP...

Some people, he predicts, may just have to find a new definition of happiness that costs less money. Cowen says this widening is the result of a shifting economy. Computers will play a larger role and people who can work with computers can make a lot. He also predicts that everyone will be ruthlessly graded — every slice of their lives, monitored, tracked and recorded.

CONTINUED with link to the audio...

http://www.npr.org/2013/09/12/221425582/tired-of-inequality-one-economist-says-itll-only-get-worse



For some reason, the interview with Steve Inskeep didn't bring up the subject of the GOVERNMENT DOING SOMETHING ABOUT IT LIKE IN THE NEW DEAL so I thought I'd bring it up. Older DUers may recall the Democratic Party once actually did do stuff for the average American, from school and work to housing and justice. But, we can't afford that now, obviously.

Oh, the good news is the 1-percent may swell to a 15-percent "upper middle class" while the rest of the middle class goes the other way. Gee. That sounds eerily familiar. Oh..."Commercial interests are very powerful interests" uttered same press conference where Smirko said, "Money trumps peace." Pretty much always the on-message 24/7/366 for most of the last century.

I hope I'm not being prescient, clarice, when I post: Tyler Cowen, man of the Final Hours.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

First read Mills assigned by my PoliSc prof Howard Zinn leveymg Jan 2016 #1
That must have been one heck of a class. Octafish Jan 2016 #2
A class project -- organizing student protests@ '81 Reagan Inaugur - earned me an A and an FBI File. leveymg Jan 2016 #5
''We have more will than wallet.'' -- George Herbert Walker Bush inaugural address Octafish Jan 2016 #8
I've been wondering about Poppy Bush. By many accounts his IQ is/was librechik Jan 2016 #33
"knowledge was the crucial element to social change" antigop Jan 2016 #3
Exactly. Thus all the propaganda instead of knowledge. Octafish Jan 2016 #4
Octa...just got through reading The Power Elite.... clarice Jan 2016 #6
One thing I know: Mills wrote about the Military Industrial Complex before there was such a term. Octafish Jan 2016 #13
Yes, he was prescient in that respect.nt clarice Jan 2016 #26
These days we get to enjoy the politico-economic wisdom of Tyler Cowen. Octafish Jan 2016 #29
Conservatives went to war against The New Deal. And they won. librechik Jan 2016 #34
It was exactly the same in the ancient Roman Republic. Odin2005 Jan 2016 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author uriel1972 Jan 2016 #11
The elites murdered Caesar, overthrew the Republic, and did themselves in for greed. Octafish Jan 2016 #14
The Comitatus Act was briefly repealed during the Katrina aftermath... Eleanors38 Jan 2016 #31
Power Elite was assigned reading in my poli sci days. Read this from Robert Reich: groovedaddy Jan 2016 #9
Reich reminds us Princeton study looked at US political scene before Citizens United. Octafish Jan 2016 #15
Yep. Me too at U of F, but not at U of T. Eleanors38 Jan 2016 #32
Studied him as an undergrauate malaise Jan 2016 #10
Love the guy. Octafish Jan 2016 #16
The first political science book I was assigned in college back in 1981 hifiguy Jan 2016 #18
Have you found Parenti's theses to be confirmed by events over the past 35 years, hifiguy? Octafish Jan 2016 #19
To quote Austin Powers, hifiguy Jan 2016 #21
yes, the triangle of power, the illusion of democracy, and the inactionary masses, nt amborin Jan 2016 #12
Now the gangsters have nukes. Octafish Jan 2016 #23
Mills was decades ahead of his time. hifiguy Jan 2016 #17
That explains why his story is seldom told any more, as JFK, who also addressed class and power... Octafish Jan 2016 #27
The steel crisis put Jack Kennedy at or near the top of hifiguy Jan 2016 #37
The power elite have been using all these same tricks and treasons upon us for thousands of years Dont call me Shirley Jan 2016 #20
And the talking heads on tee vee wonder, ''What's the problem?'' Octafish Jan 2016 #28
Thanks for your always enlightening posts, OF. Dont call me Shirley Jan 2016 #35
Okay, have read all your comments and I have not read the jwirr Jan 2016 #22
Not to disrupt this informative post and thread...but re: Bernie KoKo Jan 2016 #25
A simple, few indviduals, yes. But propped up and hoisted on the shoulders of the many. raouldukelives Jan 2016 #24
When Mill tried to get his PE published at U. of Texas Press, the book was rejected.... Eleanors38 Jan 2016 #30
Octafish! This is a Great Watch to Add: "Professor Colin Samson on C. Wright Mills" KoKo Jan 2016 #36
Thank you, KoKo! Octafish Jan 2016 #38
As you have noticed..They aren't "Customers"..anymore.... KoKo Jan 2016 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»C. Wright Mills: Sociolog...»Reply #29