Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Meldread

(4,213 posts)
2. But why go a safe vote, if Republicans are going to block anyone?
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 02:42 AM
Feb 2016

That is pretty much where my head is at the moment. I feel Republicans are going to try and block anyone from being appointed because they want to replace Scalia with another Scalia--or as close to it as they can get. So, I think we have to see it as a negotiation. In a negotiation, your first offer is always going to be rejected, meaning that at some point you are going to have to compromise and move a little bit in the other direction. This means future nominations after the initial nomination are always going to move further and further to the right. This is why he should nominate someone on the far left, this means someone like Senator Klobuchar then becomes more of a "compromise" candidate.

I'm mostly curious here on strategy and tactics--how should Obama game out this nomination?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What is the right politic...»Reply #2