Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]KamaAina
(78,249 posts)3. Come on. She's not THAT much of a DINO.
Bernie supporters voting for Drumpf? Pish tosh. Some may stay home, but vote for the vulgar talking yam? Not on your life.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
88 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

I don't think she SHOULD, but I absolutely think she WOULD if she thought it politically expedient.
Svafa
Mar 2016
#5
I live in Texas. My beloved homeland is at least 20 years, more likely 30, from flipping
Bucky
Mar 2016
#41
The two things are not mutually exclusive as demonstrated by the OP's offer of Sandoval.....
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2016
#43
It's a moo point. Even if she did consider such a thing, no Republican would dare accept it.
Tommy_Carcetti
Mar 2016
#14
She could tap Rush Limbaugh for VP and Republicans still would not vote for her. If she's the
GoneFishin
Mar 2016
#15
Horrible idea. Selecting a truly Progressive VP would convince more people to stay...
highprincipleswork
Mar 2016
#29
It would be nice if she did -- then we'd have someone more liberal than she is. nt
nichomachus
Mar 2016
#39
Then there would be a moderate republican at the top and bottom of the ticket. nt
Joe the Revelator
Mar 2016
#48