Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The right of the People [View all]beevul
(12,194 posts)26. Put your money where your keyboard is.
Is the only way to solve indifference between two sides. Nothing ever gets solved when one side negotiates from a my way or nothing position.
I offered up two ideas which I have stated before.
I offered up two ideas which I have stated before.
Ok, so what are you willing to give, in order to get what you want? If you give up nothing, were just having a debate over the difference between full and partial capitulation.
If you do not trust others that is not something I can help you with.
Sure you can. Attack your fellow anti-gunners when they poison the well with untruths like 'weapons of war on our streets', 'gunshow loophole' and 'gun safety'.
I suspect its a matter of 'wont', not 'can't'.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I can only infer you're saying no one on DU has ever posted "ban all private ownership of guns".
cherokeeprogressive
Jul 2016
#9
If, as your torturing the language assumes, the founders intended a "collective" right..
X_Digger
Jul 2016
#3
For 200+ years the Second Amendment has protected an individual right to keep and bear arms
TeddyR
Jul 2016
#40
Why is the same phrase used in the 1st and 4th amendments considered an individual right?
NutmegYankee
Jul 2016
#17