Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unblock

(55,398 posts)
6. this helps explain why polling is potentially problematic.
Sun Sep 18, 2016, 12:54 PM
Sep 2016

studies have shown that poll responses can be manipulated (quite possibly unintentionally) by many circumstances.

please of du'ers, of course, will say we're voting for hillary regardless, and there are plenty of right-wingers who will say trump.

but a significant number of people can be influenced by the exact phrasing of the question or even the previous questions.

pollsters know this and often use it deliberately, partly to get the result they want, and partly to test the effectiveness of certain lines of attack that campaigns might want to use in ads.

for example, if you lead in with a question about some "scandal" relating to one candidate or another, and follow it with a which candidate would you vote for question, you'd very likely get lower results for the candidate involved in the scandal than if you hadn't mentioned it. this is true even if the respondent knew about the scandal.

i.e., you're invoking "system 1". problem is, actual voting usually relies more on "system 2".

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why do conservatives fall...»Reply #6