Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Would you like to see the Supreme Court strike down the individual mandate? [View all]nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)31. while i don't want to see Obama "suffer a setback," striking the Individual Mandate is the right
thing to do -- which tells me that it probably won't come from this SCOTUS.
here's why i see it as a possible net good: it's bad law. it was a Heritage Foundation policy proposal. striking it down would open the door for Medicare For All which wouldn't have Constitutional issues, and this would be demanded by Americans who've received a taste of the freedom that non-employer based healthcare provides. and lastly...such action would outrage and motivate Democratic voters on the issue that's the strongest for reelection, which is maintaining control of SCOTUS nominations.
having said all that, i will be very surprised if they hand Obama this sort of political capital.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Would you like to see the Supreme Court strike down the individual mandate? [View all]
Cali_Democrat
Jun 2012
OP
to clarify, i think aca is not a great law, and the "mandate" is central to its problems
unblock
Jun 2012
#1
the income tax is replete with taxes you must pay, and many ways to reduce your taxes
unblock
Jun 2012
#41
It is an extra burden on a generation that's getting the "short end of the stick".
MrTriumph
Jun 2012
#2
Employers can, however, get a waiver to allow them to provide shoddy coverage far below aca minimums
LooseWilly
Jun 2012
#25
Absolutely not. If they do, it tears at the legal foundation of a myriad of other social programs.
pnwmom
Jun 2012
#4
MONEY FOR NOTHING! Those CEOs are disgusting individuals if they think that
SammyWinstonJack
Jun 2012
#36
Supreme Court unlikely to strike Medicaid expansion from Affordable Care Act
Motown_Johnny
Jun 2012
#22
As a stand alone clause, yes.... if it takes other parts of the law with it, no.
Motown_Johnny
Jun 2012
#9
I see the mandate as a poison pill for the rest, the good parts will be eroded or discarded
Uncle Joe
Jun 2012
#15
I hear you, EFerrari and considering the long term impact of Citizens United and the mandate,
Uncle Joe
Jun 2012
#21
I'm not really against the mandate, I fear the potential for future abuse of the mandate.
HereSince1628
Jun 2012
#20
I'm still against it in principle but no I do not want it overturned, because I fear that a negative
FLAprogressive
Jun 2012
#24
while i don't want to see Obama "suffer a setback," striking the Individual Mandate is the right
nashville_brook
Jun 2012
#31
No. I didn't have insurance for 4 years before ACA. And I want it to be 100% upheld...
Comrade_McKenzie
Jun 2012
#35
Better than nothing.......Sad that we have to settled for better than nothing wrt to health care
SammyWinstonJack
Jun 2012
#37