Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Unanimous, 3-0 ruling against the so-called president! [View all]malthaussen
(18,089 posts)58. A unanimous decision would indeed be sweet...
... and poor 45 won't be able to tweet "See you in court" after that.
However, on a sober note, it appears from things seen on the 'Net that some agencies are upholding the ban anyway. Makes no difference how the courts rule if the criminals won't follow the ruling.
-- Mal
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
58 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Wolf "So Poor and So Black" Blitzer is about as smart as a bucket of latex rubber.
TrollBuster9090
Feb 2017
#32
Tomorrow: "Sean, can we expect more insults aimed at the judiciary after this?"
randome
Feb 2017
#23
THE SO-CALLED PRESIDENT! That's what he have to keep calling him. If that's what he calls a Judge.
TrollBuster9090
Feb 2017
#29
That works, too. But 'So-Called President' is one they can't defend against,
TrollBuster9090
Feb 2017
#34