Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Tom Ripley

(4,945 posts)
12. I see it more as conservatism and neoliberalism fluttering their eyelashes at one another
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 01:13 AM
Jul 2012

since they have been in bed together for a long time

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I voted Other because TeamPooka Jun 2012 #1
This. He's a conservative judge, but as chief, didn't want to deligitimize the image of SCOTUS /nt Proles Jun 2012 #8
exactly TeamPooka Jul 2012 #9
so it was a lesser blink yurbud Jul 2012 #18
That's why I voted "Other" too...nt SidDithers Jul 2012 #10
I voted other because Roberts is the right age to know that act is a conservative idea Johonny Jul 2012 #14
I have no clue. Maybe Roberts is ill, we don't know it, and he's Sarah Ibarruri Jun 2012 #2
No, they never blink or quit or back down. MrSlayer Jun 2012 #3
if they never blinked, Bush would have figured out a way to privatize SS without congressional yurbud Jul 2012 #19
No. elleng Jun 2012 #4
He voted for a republican policy potentially limiting xchrom Jun 2012 #5
The five drew straws to see who was going to support the corporatists instead of the crazies.. Fumesucker Jun 2012 #6
He set a dangerous precedent Ruby the Liberal Jun 2012 #7
i just shuddered... silvershadow Jul 2012 #11
Here are a couple of articles about this Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #13
I see it more as conservatism and neoliberalism fluttering their eyelashes at one another Tom Ripley Jul 2012 #12
LOL EFerrari Jul 2012 #15
Maybe he saw that, ultimately, this was an argument over a REPUBLICAN policy. Marr Jul 2012 #16
I agree that going the other way COULD have led to Medicare for all, but... yurbud Jul 2012 #20
It was an entirely conservative ruling quaker bill Jul 2012 #17
one of the few times I was more optimistic than general DU opinion yurbud Jul 2012 #21
It was ROBERTS & KENNEDY doing a tandem stranglehold on both decision writing sides UTUSN Jul 2012 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Was Roberts vote conserva...»Reply #12