Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,986 posts)
Wed May 24, 2017, 01:15 PM May 2017

Why Manchester Bomber Targeted Girls [View all]

We don't know the exact motivation behind Monday's horrifying terrorist attack in Manchester, England, which killed 22 people, including an 8-year-old girl. And given that the bomber died in the attack, we're unlikely to ever find out precisely what was going through his head as he detonated that device. But one thing we do know is the demographic he targeted: young girls and women. As is so often the case with acts of violence, misogyny was deeply woven into this attack.

ISIS, which has claimed responsibility for the attack, is of course notorious for its ghastly treatment of women and girls – for mass imprisonments, rapes and acts of torture. It's not yet known if the suicide bomber, whom police have named as 22-year-old British national Salman Abedi, acted alone, or what his exposure to ISIS might have been. Regardless, the symbolism of his attack is clear and devastating. During Ariana Grande's Dangerous Woman tour, Abedi gave the world a sick reminder of the dangers of being a woman in public in 2017, attacking largely female concertgoers for doing nothing but enjoying themselves while listening to music.

These girls and women weren't just listening to any music, either – this was feminist music. Through her songs and public statements, Ariana Grande has taken a strong stand against sexism and the objectification of women, and she does so kindly, joyfully and without apology.

All of that is threatening enough. But Grande goes even further, daring to embrace sex positivity: the idea that sexuality is healthy, that it can and should be expressed in diverse ways, and that it deserves no shame.

It hardly takes being a member of ISIS to balk at women embracing their sexuality without shame – plenty of Republican lawmakers show their discomfort with the idea by attacking basic reproductive and sexual health for women. Take away shame, and you take away one of humanity's most powerful tools for keeping women in line; suicide bombs and oppressive laws might put women in their place, but shame is the glue that holds it all together.

http://www.rollingstone.com/culture/features/why-it-matters-that-the-manchester-attack-targeted-girls-w483855?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_content=daily&utm_campaign=052417_12

37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Manchester Bomber Targeted Girls [View all] Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2017 OP
K&R WhiskeyGrinder May 2017 #1
k and r niyad May 2017 #2
walking side to side ... a real testiment to feminisim Ohioblue22 May 2017 #3
Not sure about that. Fla Dem May 2017 #21
Can't it be both? LisaM May 2017 #23
She can enjoy sex as much as she wants. Fla Dem May 2017 #31
my apologies ... i thought the sarcasm was loud and clear Ohioblue22 May 2017 #29
Ok, my bad. I was a bit slow on your finese. Not a fan either. Fla Dem May 2017 #30
this: niyad May 2017 #4
I believe that many republicans, including our Vice President, brer cat May 2017 #9
sadly, you are quite correct. niyad May 2017 #10
Truth! iluvtennis May 2017 #20
Nailed it...nt 2naSalit May 2017 #5
"As is so often the case with acts of violence, misogyny was deeply woven into this attack." sheshe2 May 2017 #6
I don't like Trump, but he's right - The bomber was a complete loser. Oneironaut May 2017 #7
Note to tRump Scarsdale May 2017 #15
Bombings are why they created NHS IronLionZion May 2017 #16
GOP Scarsdale May 2017 #17
exactly!!!! niyad May 2017 #37
They hate sure, but they are even more afraid. Ligyron May 2017 #25
What bothered me about 45s use of the word "loser" was that he has called Hillary Clinton that Boomerproud May 2017 #33
Read up to this... Azathoth May 2017 #8
You know what? Who cares? RhodeIslandOne May 2017 #11
welcome to du niyad May 2017 #12
Women who like lots of sex can still be against objectification of women IronLionZion May 2017 #14
Had to google lyrics. Duppers May 2017 #32
All it means is calling Arianna a feminist is a stretch Egnever May 2017 #34
"We don't know the exact motivation behind Monday's horrifying terrorist attack". So we don't know PoliticAverse May 2017 #13
That struck me as quite odd too. JoeStuckInOH May 2017 #18
The Daily Mail (ugh) Saviolo May 2017 #19
... Duppers May 2017 #28
I think what people are objecting to is the idea Egnever May 2017 #35
"We don't know the exact motivation behind Monday's horrifying terrorist attack in Manchester" melman May 2017 #22
"He Named Me Malala" - the documentary about Malala Yousafzai is excellent on this. There is Amaryllis May 2017 #24
Her book "I am Malala" is also excellent LeftInTX May 2017 #26
K & R Duppers May 2017 #27
I am not familiar with Ms. Grande but she is a victim Skittles May 2017 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why Manchester Bomber Tar...