Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

edhopper

(33,653 posts)
6. They have been teaching that in the South
Tue Aug 15, 2017, 09:17 AM
Aug 2017

Last edited Tue Aug 15, 2017, 11:51 AM - Edit history (1)

for generations.

So someone has to come in and tell us how the South isn't a problem.

Except, no South, no Trump, no GOP majority.

this bullshit has been around a long time....states rights to own people.... spanone Aug 2017 #1
State's rights to maintain SLAVERY hlthe2b Aug 2017 #2
Willful ignorance on the part of the alt-right, or just the right in general. bullwinkle428 Aug 2017 #3
This. They choose to disconnect the two because otherwise mythology Aug 2017 #15
Tell them to read the fricking Confederate constitution mcar Aug 2017 #4
Or the individual states Articles of Succession... Raster Aug 2017 #7
That's right mcar Aug 2017 #8
Also the declarations of seccession of many of those states state clearly that they are... brush Aug 2017 #41
They sure didn't hide their motivations mcar Aug 2017 #72
That bullshit --and it is bullshit-- comes from those attempting to WHITE-wash history... Raster Aug 2017 #5
They have been teaching that in the South edhopper Aug 2017 #6
Not just the south El Mimbreno Aug 2017 #32
Fortunately, you've held onto the attitude! PJMcK Aug 2017 #51
From a northern city as well, I still remember the question on the test, Canoe52 Aug 2017 #46
okay edhopper Aug 2017 #75
Yep ExciteBike66 Aug 2017 #9
Double Yep.. mitch96 Aug 2017 #29
Yeah, the Confederate leadership were hypocritical assholes of the highest order. cemaphonic Aug 2017 #76
It was totally about slavery workinclasszero Aug 2017 #10
Tell these idiots to read each state's secession speech. Lars39 Aug 2017 #11
I have heard that crap my whole life get the red out Aug 2017 #12
What was it about then? syringis Aug 2017 #13
Of course it was about slavery... whathehell Aug 2017 #14
Southern white kids learn that bullshit on their parents' knees. Paladin Aug 2017 #16
I ran into that strange excuse for BootinUp Aug 2017 #17
Would there have been a war without slavery? FLPanhandle Aug 2017 #18
All the resolutions of secession mention the necessity of slavery to the southern way of life. muntrv Aug 2017 #19
Yes it was. atreides1 Aug 2017 #20
Very interesting.. Thanks for posting! whathehell Aug 2017 #24
Case closed! workinclasszero Aug 2017 #26
Done !!! uponit7771 Aug 2017 #53
I am not big on Prager University marylandblue Aug 2017 #69
Oh, brother. Outbreak was over whether slavery would be legal Hortensis Aug 2017 #21
Anyone ever heard of the "War of Northern Aggression"? whathehell Aug 2017 #22
It was hurple Aug 2017 #23
I've run into that BS for years. I usually tell them to read the first two paragraph's of Hoyt Aug 2017 #25
It was about preserving the Union. The Union would not need preserving if the states patricia92243 Aug 2017 #27
PLease point them to the Cornerstone Speech. I keep this quote on hand. Adrahil Aug 2017 #28
They teach this in schools in the south SHRED Aug 2017 #30
This is what I was taught in 1948-49 in the 8th grade. In Texas, of course. Thirties Child Aug 2017 #31
One of my husband's nephews--who lives in Georgia--posted this on his fb page not long ago mnhtnbb Aug 2017 #33
Maybe you can call him "General Embarrassment" Orrex Aug 2017 #35
yeah d_r Aug 2017 #38
Wait, how can one put "slavery" and "free market" in the same thing? ck4829 Aug 2017 #44
It's the same type of irrational logic that defends religious rights mnhtnbb Aug 2017 #58
The Cornerstone Speech blows that lie out of the water Orrex Aug 2017 #34
the other argument is that it was about economics d_r Aug 2017 #36
Much of the financing for southern purchase of slaves came from the northern financiers flyingfysh Aug 2017 #39
The tarriffs of the 1850s d_r Aug 2017 #42
southern cotton was the cheapest in the world flyingfysh Aug 2017 #43
I'm saying what I've heard people say nt d_r Aug 2017 #45
like this link d_r Aug 2017 #47
It was a different kind of slavery Lithos Aug 2017 #74
That's what I was taught in schools growing up in Ohio. JoeStuckInOH Aug 2017 #64
People only need to read the secessionists' own words flyingfysh Aug 2017 #37
States' rights? Yeah, sure. During the Civil War, Georgia had SWBTATTReg Aug 2017 #40
I don't think I have ever heard the "States Rights" issue used... Wounded Bear Aug 2017 #48
Just today, someone told me it was because the North blocked Southern cotton exports to England muriel_volestrangler Aug 2017 #49
The causes are many. It is a mistake to try to boil everything down to 1 cause. TexasProgresive Aug 2017 #50
I was in junior high school when the Civil War Centennial rolled around. PoindexterOglethorpe Aug 2017 #52
You mean The War of Northern Agression? nolabear Aug 2017 #54
That's what the previous President of NRA called the war -- Big Jim Porter, a white wing Hoyt Aug 2017 #84
As a Southerner (many generations..) TBA Aug 2017 #55
Richmond has a large Civil War museum. mn9driver Aug 2017 #56
Twas about slavery in their own words: yowzayowzayowza Aug 2017 #57
I thought for a long time it was about slavery, but as I got older I realized that it was LiberalArkie Aug 2017 #59
Look at the southern states own declarations of secession CanonRay Aug 2017 #60
Lee's of Virginia DeminPennswoods Aug 2017 #61
They should read the statements from the states as to why they seceded JonLP24 Aug 2017 #62
The Civil War was about SC Not Ruth Aug 2017 #63
If you wonder what I mean about out of hand, these are the numbers Not Ruth Aug 2017 #66
I understand why people want to forget it, it was horrible, I would ban any memorial to war Not Ruth Aug 2017 #67
SC was a diehard slavery state Not Ruth Aug 2017 #70
I took a course about the Civil War in College HopeAgain Aug 2017 #65
Wow just wow Lotusflower70 Aug 2017 #68
They didn't give a shit about "state's rights" when it came to the Fugitive Slave Law... First Speaker Aug 2017 #71
The Fugitive Slave Laws is one of the strongest arguments against the "states rights" theory cemaphonic Aug 2017 #80
Yes, good point. n/t whathehell Aug 2017 #86
Yes/No Lithos Aug 2017 #73
First use of propaganda? Really? BootinUp Aug 2017 #77
Modern use of propaganda, yes Lithos Aug 2017 #78
Oddly enough, each state's Articles of Secession mentioned slavery as a relevant motivation LanternWaste Aug 2017 #82
There is a distinction Lithos Aug 2017 #83
The "economic" talking point is both trivially obvious and insidiously misleading Azathoth Aug 2017 #79
+1 BootinUp Aug 2017 #81
if the state says it folks believe it...russians still don't think we landed on the moon dembotoz Aug 2017 #85
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Civil War was not abo...»Reply #6