Divisive Myths to Bash Ralph Northam and Democrats in VA

[FSogol]

55. Pure fantasy Ken

1) It's divisive to keep attacking Perriello after he lost and to minimize his role in helping elect Northam.

I didn't, I said he was a help during the campaign, I also said he was liked by most Virginians.

If the guy isn't in the race any more, there's no good reason to keep doing talking points against him.

I used no talking points against him. His voting record isn't a talking point.

It's not as though it was offensive that Perriello even ran.

Never said it was.

Perriello lost. Probably he deserved to lose.

Deserve to lose? I didn't say that. Perriello is a good guy and would make a good Governor. Northam served as Lt Gov and is in everyone's mind, as I pointed out. That puts him ahead of Perriello and the primary voters agreed.

You don't need to keep going after him OR deny him any particular credit for helping Northam.

I haven't gone after him or denied him credit, I said he helped Northam. People who want to divide us, are you following Ken?, want to make this about Perriello. It wasn't.

2) It's divisive (and a strawman) to imply that anyone claimed Democratic Socialists were the ONLY winners or did better than any other sort of Democrat. It was simply pointed out that they did as well as "moderates" and are a major part of the Democratic coalition. It doesn't hurt the party to give Democratic Socialists SOME bragging rights, and there aren't THAT many people who'd vote for us but ONLY if we make a big show of being just as much against the Left as we are against the Right.

LOL, nice try, but check out some of the bash Northam and praise the socialists threads on the greatest page.

Why would you do such a bitter OP when Tuesday was a big night and Northam WON?

Bitter? Thanks for the chuckles Ken!