Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: AP EXCLUSIVE: UN TO LET IRAN INSPECT ALLEGED NUKE WORK SITE [View all]geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)21. Iran deal opponents now have their "death panels" lie, and it's a whopper
http://www.vox.com/2015/8/19/9176415/iran-deal-inspections-24-days
You guys on Team PNAC are really persistent, gotta give you that.
The debate over the Iran nuclear deal may now have its own version of "death panels," a provision that is both a point of overwhelming criticism and largely fictitious.
"Particularly troublesome, you have to wait 24 days before you can inspect," Sen. Chuck Schumer told reporters last week, explaining why he is opposing the deal.
Conservative media have hammered at this idea: that nuclear inspectors must wait 24 days before visiting any place in Iran that is not a declared nuclear site. Sometimes they imply or outright state, as in the case of this staggeringly misleading but representative Fox News story, that the 24-day wait applies even to known nuclear sites.
This certainly sounds scary. It sounds, as the critics often say, like those bumbling appeasers in the Obama administration have handed Iran the ability to cheat on the deal and then prevent inspectors from catching them.
Fortunately, this is all largely false. It's a lot like "death panels," in which Obamacare critics took a benign fact about the health-care bill it would include end-of-life counseling and then spun it up into a massive lie about how President Obama was going to cancel Granny's life-sustaining medications and send her to an early grave. This is an issue on which nuclear deal critics have taken a small truth and then exaggerated, distorted, and outright lied about it to make it into something very different.
"Particularly troublesome, you have to wait 24 days before you can inspect," Sen. Chuck Schumer told reporters last week, explaining why he is opposing the deal.
Conservative media have hammered at this idea: that nuclear inspectors must wait 24 days before visiting any place in Iran that is not a declared nuclear site. Sometimes they imply or outright state, as in the case of this staggeringly misleading but representative Fox News story, that the 24-day wait applies even to known nuclear sites.
This certainly sounds scary. It sounds, as the critics often say, like those bumbling appeasers in the Obama administration have handed Iran the ability to cheat on the deal and then prevent inspectors from catching them.
Fortunately, this is all largely false. It's a lot like "death panels," in which Obamacare critics took a benign fact about the health-care bill it would include end-of-life counseling and then spun it up into a massive lie about how President Obama was going to cancel Granny's life-sustaining medications and send her to an early grave. This is an issue on which nuclear deal critics have taken a small truth and then exaggerated, distorted, and outright lied about it to make it into something very different.
You guys on Team PNAC are really persistent, gotta give you that.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
104 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

You have a low post count, but some people on DU like to kill the messenger...
happyslug
Aug 2015
#35
I read a lot of people on DU, and I hate it when people leave do to attacks by others
happyslug
Aug 2015
#38
You should say, as calling out people for low post counts violates DU Rules. n/t
whathehell
Aug 2015
#54
You can't 'hide' radiation in 24 days. You're determined to put the worst possible light on this.
randome
Aug 2015
#25
But they keep saying they dont have a weapons program, so how would that be possible?
7962
Aug 2015
#87
RW media knows SO much more than nuclear scientists. GOP voters have been swallowing
blm
Aug 2015
#85
To be explained away at a later date. As soon as they can come up with something! nt
7962
Aug 2015
#12
No, because we happen to know that Parchin isn't even a nuclear research site.
geek tragedy
Aug 2015
#14
the ap already updated it's story and the administration never confirmed the story
karynnj
Aug 2015
#43
"I know DU trusts the oh-so-trustworthy mullahs " still getting your information
geek tragedy
Aug 2015
#64
AP has removed the claim that Iran would be making the inspections themselves, rather than UN
still_one
Aug 2015
#55
and I cannot either. However, I still question the original stories' implication
still_one
Aug 2015
#62
There are several things that have come out subsequently. For one thing, AP definitely distorted
still_one
Aug 2015
#75
If you're suggesting the administration has confirmed that it's going to allow
geek tragedy
Aug 2015
#67
HA! Good to know we've got DUers who are fine with North Korea & Iran having a nuke!
7962
Aug 2015
#72
And then 2 years later without an agreement, then what? Utter nonsense that you think
blm
Aug 2015
#97
AP has deliberately distorted the story. The Obama administration has said the following:
still_one
Aug 2015
#76