Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(104,968 posts)
7. Not, as far as I know, in London, but isnsome other European countries
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 11:16 AM
Jan 2016

(certainly the central Bank of England rate is still positive, though at its historic low).

Directly, it's not a shift of wealth to the rich - this is telling the rich (ie financial institutions) that they'll have to pay to store money in the safety of the central bank. In reaction, those banks may then lower the rates they pay their own depositors, but they could have tried that before - they just might have found people took their money out of that bank. The idea is to encourage people to 'invest' their money in some scheme that doesn't involve it just sitting overnight in a bank.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

So, they want everyone to take their money out of the bank? Kelvin Mace Jan 2016 #1
to get the economy moving Randomthought Jan 2016 #2
So, does this affect all accounts Kelvin Mace Jan 2016 #3
just accounts at the central bank belonging to financial institutions muriel_volestrangler Jan 2016 #5
Thanks. Kelvin Mace Jan 2016 #12
Tiered Randomthought Jan 2016 #6
Doesn't this already exist elsewhere, like London? Gregorian Jan 2016 #4
Not, as far as I know, in London, but isnsome other European countries muriel_volestrangler Jan 2016 #7
It's not people - but the banks Thav Jan 2016 #8
I'm wondering though GummyBearz Jan 2016 #9
Banks have so many schemes Thav Jan 2016 #10
There is more to penalize GummyBearz Jan 2016 #11
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Bank of Japan shocks mark...»Reply #7