Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
30. I admire people who tell the truth. That's why I have a problem with you, Major Nikon.
Sat May 14, 2016, 01:35 PM
May 2016

Why do you bring up UFOs and crop circles? Is it to smear me for expressing an interest in subjects that some "authority" says don't exist? If it is to besmirch my reputation on DU, that would be the mark of a smear artist.

Four names stand for what I know about UFOs: Mantell, Moncla, Wilson, Valentich.

The first three were pilots, officers in the United States armed forces. The fourth name was a young Australian air cadet. Each lost their life in association with UFOs. There likely are others. Here's a bit on them:

Thomas Mantell





Mantell Case (1948)

EXCERPT...

Mantell was an experienced pilot; his flight history consisted of 2,167 hours in the air, and he had been honored for his part in the Battle of Normandy during World War II.

On 7 January 1948, Godman Field at Fort Knox, Kentucky received a report from the Kentucky Highway Patrol of an unusual aerial object near Maysville, Kentucky. Reports of a westbound circular object, 250 feet (76 m) to 300 feet (91 m) in diameter, were received from Owensboro, Kentucky, and Irvington, Kentucky.

At about 1:45 p.m., Sgt Quinton Blackwell saw an object from his position in the control tower at Fort Knox. Two other witnesses in the tower also reported a white object in the distance. Base commander Colonel Guy Hix reported an object he described as "very white," and "about one fourth the size of the full moon ... Through binoculars it appeared to have a red border at the bottom ... It remained stationary, seemingly, for one and a half hours." Observers at Clinton County Army Air Field in Ohio described the object "as having the appearance of a flaming red cone trailing a gaseous green mist" and observed the object for around 35 minutes. Another observer at Lockbourne Army Air Field in Ohio noted, "Just before leaving it came to very near the ground, staying down for about ten seconds, then climbed at a very fast rate back to its original altitude, 10,000 feet, leveling off and disappearing into the overcast heading 120 degrees. Its speed was greater than 500 mph in level flight."

Four P-51 Mustangs of C Flight, 165th Fighter Squadron Kentucky Air National Guard already in the air—one piloted by Mantell—were told to approach the object. Blackwell was in radio communication with the pilots throughout the event.

One pilot's Mustang was low on fuel, and he quickly abandoned his efforts. Air Force Captain Edward J. Ruppelt (the first head of Project Blue Book) notes that there was some disagreement amongst the air traffic controllers as to Mantell's words as he communicated with the tower: some sources reported that Mantell had described an object &quot which) looks metallic and of tremendous size," but, according to Ruppelt in The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects, others disputed whether or not Mantell actually said this.

The other two pilots accompanied Mantell in steep pursuit of the object. They later reported they saw an object, but described it as so small and indistinct they could not identify it. Mantell ignored suggestions that the pilots should level their altitude and try to more clearly see the object.

Only one of Mantell's companions, Lt. Albert Clemmons, had an oxygen mask, and his oxygen was in low supply. Clemmons and a Lt. Hammond called off their pursuit at 22,500 feet (6,900 m). Mantell continued to climb, however. According to the Air Force, once Mantell passed 25,000 feet (7,600 m) he supposedly blacked out from the lack of oxygen (hypoxia), and his plane began spiraling back towards the ground. A witness later reported Mantell's Mustang in a circling descent. His plane crashed at a farm south of Franklin, Kentucky, on the Tennessee-Kentucky state line.

Firemen later pulled Mantell's body from the Mustang's wreckage. His wristwatch had stopped at 3:18 p.m., the time of his crash. Meanwhile, by 3:50 p.m. the UFO was no longer visible to observers at Godman Field. The Mantell Incident was reported by newspapers around the nation, and received significant news media attention. A number of sensational rumors were also circulated about Mantell's crash. Among the rumors were claims that Mantell's fighter had been shot down by the UFO he was chasing, and that the Air Force covered up evidence proving this. Another rumor stated that Mantell's body was found riddled with strange holes. However, no evidence has ever surfaced to substantiate any of these claims. In 1956, Ruppelt wrote that the Mantell Crash was one of three "classic" UFO cases in 1948 that would help to define the UFO phenomenon in the public mind, and would help to convince Air Force intelligence specialists that UFOs were a "real", physical phenomenon (Ruppelt 30). The other two sightings were the Gorman Dogfight and the Chiles-Whitted UFO Encounter.

CONTINUED...

http://www.mufon.com/mantell-case---1948.html



Felix Moncla and Robert Wilson





Radar operator stated he watched the aircraft approach the UFO; then saw the two blips merge into one return on his scope; which then took off at a high rate of speed and out of radar range.

Marksville Weekly News

Avoyelles Parish has connections to a UFO mystery that goes back 49 years. Gordon Heath from Surrey, British Columbia was in Marksville recently to investigate the background of Lt. Felix E. Moncla who disappeared along with another crew member, Second Lt. Robert L. Wilson, over Lake Superior on Monday, November 23, 1953.

According to Heath, who is a UFO hobbyist, Moncla was on temporary assignment at Kinross Air Force Base in ...(sic. Michigan)... when he was sent to identify and unidentified craft over the Soo Locks, which is restricted airspace. Moncla, in an F-89C, pursued the craft for about 30 minutes flying at 30,000 feet over the middle of Lake Superior. He was flying about 500 mph when he was instructed by ground radar to descend to 7,000 feet.

When the unidentified craft was finally on radar it was noted that the two radar images, the UFO and the Air Force jet, were very close and at some point they intersected but only one remained. Heath says that the unidentified craft flew north and disappeared from radar.

Lt. Moncla's jet mysteriously disappeared without a trace.

http://www.nuforc.org/mancla.html


No remains of the crew or wreckage of the F-89C have been found.



Frederick Valentich



His late father holds the missing flyer's picture:



Delta Sierra Juliet? Do you read?

Boats and aircraft have found no trace of the 20-year old Australian pilot who disappeared with his plane on Saturday night after radioing that he was being chased by a UFO. Frederick Valentich was on a 125 mile training flight in his single engine Cessna 182 along the coast of Bass Strait when he told air traffic controllers in Melbourne that he was being buzzed by a UFO with 4 bright lights about 1000 feet above him.

Controllers said his last message was taped and was: "It's approaching from due east towards me. It seems to be playing some sort of game... flying at a speed I can't estimate. It's not an aircraft. It's...It is flying past. It is a long shape. I cannot identify more than that. It's coming for me right now." A minute later: "It seems to be stationary. I'm also orbiting and the thing is orbiting on top of me also. It has a green light and a sort of metallic light on the outside." Valentich then radioed that his engine was running roughly. His last words were: "It is not an aircraft."

The Australian Air Force said it had received 11 reports from people along the coast who said they saw UFOs on Saturday night, but the Transport Department was skeptical. Ken Williams, a spokesman for the department, said, "It's funny all these people ringing up with UFO reports well after Valentich's disappearance. It seems people often decide after the event, they too had seen strange lights. But although we can't take them too seriously, we can never discourgae such reports when investigating a plane's disappearance."

SNIP...

[font size="5"]ACTUAL TRANSCRIPTION OF MELBOURNE FLIGHT SERVICE [/font size]

The transcript portion of the communication between Valentich and Melbourne Flight Service as released by the Australian Department of Transport follows: (FS - Flight Service, DSJ - Frederick Valentich aircraft designation).
1906:14 DSJ Melbourne, this is Delta Sierra Juliet. Is there any known traffic below five thousand?

FS Delta Sierra Juliet, no known traffic.

DSJ Delta Sierra Juliet, I am, seems to be a large aircraft below five thousand.

1906:44 FS Delta Sierra Juliet, What type of aircraft is it?

DSJ Delta Sierra Juliet, I cannot affirm, it is four bright, it seems to me like landing lights.

1907 FS Delta Sierra Juliet.

1907:31 DSJ Melbourne, this is Delta Sierra Juliet, the aircraft has just passed over me at least a thousand feet above.

FS Delta Sierra Juliet, roger, and it is a large aircraft, confirmed?

DSJ Er-unknown, due to the speed it's travelling, is there any air force aircraft in the vicinity?

FS Delta Sierra Juliet, no known aircraft in the vicinity.

1908:18 DSJ Melbourne, it's approaching now from due east towards me.

FS Delta Sierra Juliet.

1908:41 DSJ (open microphone for two seconds.)

1908:48 DSJ Delta Sierra Juliet, it seems to me that he's playing some sort of game, he's flying over me two, three times at speeds I could not identify.

1909 FS Delta Sierra Juliet, roger, what is your actual level?

DSJ My level is four and a half thousand, four five zero zero.

FS Delta Sierra Juliet, and you confirm you cannot identify the aircraft?

DSJ Affirmative.

FS Delta Sierra Juliet, roger, stand by.

1909:27 DSJ Melbourne, Delta Sierra Juliet, it's not an aircraft it is (open microphone for two seconds).

1909:42 FS Delta Sierra Juliet, can you describe the -er- aircraft?

DSJ Delta Sierra Juliet, as it's flying past it's a long shape (open microphone for three seconds) cannot identify more than it has such speed (open microphone for three seconds). It's before me right now Melbourne.

1910 FS Delta Sierra Juliet, roger and how large would the - er - object be?

1910:19 DSJ Delta Sierra Juliet, Melbourne, it seems like it's stationary. What I'm doing right now is orbiting and the thing is just orbiting on top of me also. It's got a green light and sort of metallic like, it's all shiny on the outside.

FS Delta Sierra Juliet

1910:46 DSJ Delta Sierra Juliet (open microphone for three seconds) It's just vanished.

FS Delta Sierra Juliet

1911 DSJ Melbourne, would you know what kind of aircraft I've got? Is it a military aircraft?

FS Delta Sierra Juliet, Confirm the - er ~ aircraft just vanished.

DSJ Say again.

FS Delta Sierra Juliet, is the aircraft still with you?

DSJ Delta Sierra Juliet; it's (open microphone for two seconds) now approaching from the south-west.

FS Delta Sierra Juliet

1911:50 DSJ Delta Sierra Juliet, the engine is rough-idling. I've got it set at twenty three twenty-four and the thing is coughing.

FS Delta Sierra Juliet, roger, what are your intentions?

DSJ My intentions are - ah - to go to King Island - ah - Melbourne. That strange aircraft is hovering on top of me again (open microphone for two seconds). It is hovering and it's not an aircraft.

FS Delta Sierra Juliet.

1912:28 DSJ Delta Sierra Juliet. Melbourne (open microphone for seventeen seconds).

SOURCE: http://www.ufocasebook.com/australianpilot.html



People who are interested in these subjects shouldn't be mocked. They are interested in learning about the unknown. That's why I'm glad to say I am not a person who holds a worldview so small that it is defined by taboos and limited by others' ideas of what is and what can be. Such "thinking" limits one's vision as to what one's own life can be and the wonders the universe may hold. Moreover, it is an incredibly cowardly way to live a very small life.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Mark Lane opened our eyes, breaking the myths of democracy and freedom our government was meant to Kip Humphrey May 2016 #1
He made an outstanding presentation at the Duquesne conference... Octafish May 2016 #14
The original paperback edition of Mark Lane's "Rush To Judgement " is still on my bookshelf. hedda_foil May 2016 #15
Oh, how I WISHED I had taken the extra day to see him at that conference, Octafish... MrMickeysMom May 2016 #42
Thank you, MrMickeysMom! The People in Pittsburgh are amazing. Octafish May 2016 #58
One of my early hero's... CanSocDem May 2016 #2
Yours is a great memory. Octafish May 2016 #17
Assuredly... CanSocDem May 2016 #23
Mark Lane, Thank You for your contribution, CRH May 2016 #3
A Great Democrat Octafish May 2016 #18
The Mafia-CIA-Cubans-FBI finally got him Freddie Stubbs May 2016 #4
I suspect the real story was he was traveling in a small airplane Major Nikon May 2016 #9
Yeah! Like Paul Wellstone and JFK, Jr. Octafish May 2016 #21
More like like chemtrails and UFOs Major Nikon May 2016 #22
No, more like Nixon and Dulles and Bush. Octafish May 2016 #24
Must be the crop circles Major Nikon May 2016 #25
I admire people who tell the truth. That's why I have a problem with you, Major Nikon. Octafish May 2016 #30
You'll have to excuse my momentary lapses of reason Major Nikon May 2016 #34
No need for disinformation. Octafish May 2016 #101
Then why bring it up? Major Nikon May 2016 #103
DISINFORMATION Part 2: How Trolls Control an Internet Forum Octafish May 2016 #110
Here's your alien abduction post... Major Nikon May 2016 #111
No where do I mention aliens, though. Octafish May 2016 #113
True Major Nikon May 2016 #117
So why do you need to imply I said that? Octafish May 2016 #120
Fair enough Major Nikon May 2016 #122
Never had known this and see it's completely consistant with RN's character. Judi Lynn May 2016 #36
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel May 2016 #29
No. What's ''loony left'' is siding with Karl Rove over Don Siegelman. Octafish May 2016 #41
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel May 2016 #45
After two judges tossed the case, they found a Rove appointee. Octafish May 2016 #77
Lane didn't even mention CIA in ''Rush to Judgement'' Octafish May 2016 #19
Aha, so only 50 years after coming up with his theory, tptb found a way to silence Mr. Lane. FSogol May 2016 #5
Time runs out for all human beings. Octafish May 2016 #20
Excellent book. He refused to believe that a dim-witted former commie, with poor marksmanship, Doctor_J May 2016 #6
I've tried to recreate the shots in christx30 May 2016 #7
Lane said J Edgar Hoover naming Oswald the lone assassin within hours was a sign of cover-up. Octafish May 2016 #31
I bought his book on the assassination and for many years jwirr May 2016 #8
Thank you for sharing that, jwirr. Octafish May 2016 #37
Being homeless is still a problem but finally my daughter has jwirr May 2016 #44
... 2naSalit May 2016 #10
Truly a great American. Some of his accomplishments... Octafish May 2016 #63
Citizen Lane: freedom rider, screenwriter... MinM May 2016 #11
Thanks to his efforts, MinM, we KNOW. Octafish May 2016 #72
Sad Day Mark 750 May 2016 #12
It was a sad day! Octafish May 2016 #78
Rush to Judgment (1966) Youtube complete Ichingcarpenter May 2016 #13
Those are the Stories. Octafish May 2016 #81
Cross gently, Mark. Cooley Hurd May 2016 #16
Thank you, Cooley Hurd. Octafish May 2016 #83
I am now conviinced the kill shot came from the car behind, the agent with the gun that Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #26
There is a movie about it on Netflix? longship May 2016 #27
Pretty clear what happened... Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #61
I know. Lee Harvey Oswald shot JFK. longship May 2016 #68
He was shot from the car behind him? Are you serious? Bucky May 2016 #33
This is the gun that killed him Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #62
Mark Lane reported the truth. He did not add noise. Octafish May 2016 #48
Only 89? hmmm...sounds suspicious to me Adenoid_Hynkel May 2016 #28
Actually, it took Mark Lane years to document the CIA - MAFIA Murder Inc. relationship. Octafish May 2016 #84
Can GHWBush account for his whereabouts when these alleged "natural causes" occurred? Bucky May 2016 #32
You have the right idea, just the wrong suspects Major Nikon May 2016 #35
Here's who to suspect: Those who've spent the last 52 years covering it up, the BFEE. Octafish May 2016 #38
That's actually a pretty brilliant plan Major Nikon May 2016 #39
But that's not what the post was about. Here's something else to know, Dude... Octafish May 2016 #40
Yep, nothing like a dose of John Hankey Major Nikon May 2016 #43
Is that why John McAdams archived that thread? Octafish May 2016 #46
I have no idea why a wingnut would "archive" one of your unrelated posts Major Nikon May 2016 #47
I posted fact. You post straw men and ad hominem. Octafish May 2016 #49
No, what you posted came from John Hankey who is an anti-Semite Major Nikon May 2016 #50
Appeal to authority now. Octafish May 2016 #53
WTF are you even talking about? Major Nikon May 2016 #55
Your smears, threats and distortions. Octafish May 2016 #57
Diversion noted Major Nikon May 2016 #59
That is a despicable thing to write. Octafish May 2016 #60
Promoting the LaRouche movement is pretty fucking despicable Major Nikon May 2016 #64
Don't get all frothy, Major Nikon. Those are the FBI documents. Octafish May 2016 #65
You have such patience. CanSocDem May 2016 #66
CIA is still up to its old shenanigans. Octafish May 2016 #70
Why don't you just say "my dog ate my proof"? Major Nikon May 2016 #67
Because it wouldn't be true. Octafish May 2016 #69
By all means keep on promoting the work of anti-Semites if that's what does it for you Major Nikon May 2016 #71
Nice smear. If I was an ''anti-Semite" interested in ''butthurt" I'd be long gone from DU. Octafish May 2016 #73
I didn't claim you were an anti-Semite Major Nikon May 2016 #74
You also defend Bush & Cheney Octafish May 2016 #75
Bullshit Major Nikon May 2016 #76
Be sure to put this in your memoire. Octafish May 2016 #82
You flatter yourself Major Nikon May 2016 #85
How droll. Octafish May 2016 #86
I think you're worried about how close I'm getting to what you're really about Major Nikon May 2016 #92
Smears all up and down this thread, but what bothers me most... Octafish May 2016 #99
I tell you what Major Nikon May 2016 #102
What do you think you've been doing up and down this thread? Octafish May 2016 #115
Your post was alereted on! cleanhippie May 2016 #87
His journal is filled with him parroting out one of the founders of the LaRouche movement Major Nikon May 2016 #90
Smear by association. Octafish May 2016 #93
217 results Major Nikon May 2016 #96
So those who chronicle the crimes of the Bush family are a problem for you. Nice. Octafish May 2016 #98
For those that don't know, Webster Tarpley was involved in the LaRouche movement for decades Major Nikon May 2016 #104
Please do. The defenders of the Warren Report say, "Case closed." I don't. Octafish May 2016 #91
Lol. It was only because of the silly alert that I was drug into this. cleanhippie May 2016 #94
Laugh all you want. Octafish May 2016 #97
Why do you keep parroting out works from LaRouche's Executive Intelligence Review? Major Nikon May 2016 #105
Show where I'm ''a fan'' or link to anything of that. Octafish May 2016 #107
You didn't answer the question Major Nikon May 2016 #108
I don't have to do anything you demand, on DU or anywhere. Octafish May 2016 #118
True, you don't have to provide evidence of any of your smears Major Nikon May 2016 #124
Jury results cleanhippie May 2016 #95
Evidence of Octafish's fondness for LaRouche Major Nikon May 2016 #100
My reputation matters to me. Octafish May 2016 #106
So why do you keep parroting out works from LaRouche's Executive Intelligence Review? Major Nikon May 2016 #109
You are so right. 14 years on DU. Octafish May 2016 #112
So I'm smearing you with the very material you are posting yourself Major Nikon May 2016 #114
You smear me and I'm supposed to do what you demand? Octafish May 2016 #116
I've yet to see you post the slightest proof I've ever expressed fondness for Bush or Cheney Major Nikon May 2016 #119
Defend. Octafish May 2016 #121
And you've done both Major Nikon May 2016 #123
Call me names or a Larouchie, I don't care. Octafish May 2016 #125
Obviously you do care Major Nikon May 2016 #126
Not really. I side with Mark Lane. You side with Bush and Cheney, Major Nikon. Octafish May 2016 #127
No, really Major Nikon May 2016 #128
Like self-referential posts. Octafish May 2016 #129
Sure, I'm smearing you with your own posts Major Nikon May 2016 #130
Actually, that shows me using the truth to slam the BFEE. Octafish May 2016 #131
If your "truth" was as rock solid as you claim, why go to LaRouche to get it? Major Nikon May 2016 #132
Why do you spend so much time smearing me and defending Bush, Major Nikon? Octafish May 2016 #134
Pointing out that LaRouche is a batshit crazy anti-Semite = "defending Bush" Major Nikon May 2016 #135
But you were calling me an anti-Semite Larouche supporter all over upthread. Octafish May 2016 #136
Bullshit Major Nikon May 2016 #137
Maybe not a good time to mention it, but you're repeating yourself. Octafish May 2016 #138
You stole my line! Major Nikon May 2016 #139
No. I've used alert probably six or seven times in 55,000 posts or whatever it is. Octafish May 2016 #142
There should be a warning before posting the Cheney/Rumsfeld photo! Judi Lynn May 2016 #52
Sorry about that photo. It connects evil from 1963 to 2016. Octafish May 2016 #54
I remember listening to him when I was quite young gopiscrap May 2016 #51
Thank you for sharing those memories, gopiscrap. Octafish May 2016 #88
thanks for posting this gopiscrap May 2016 #141
I heard him speak at the University of Minnesota at least 40 years ago. dflprincess May 2016 #56
Thank you for sharing those memories, dflprincess. Octafish May 2016 #89
And thank you for all your research dflprincess May 2016 #140
NYT calls Lane a "conspiracy theorist?" KansDem May 2016 #79
Thank you for pointing that out, KansDem. Octafish May 2016 #80
The effects of propaganda on display. CanSocDem May 2016 #133
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2020 #143
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Mark Lane, Early Kennedy ...»Reply #30