Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Mark Lane, Early Kennedy Assassination Conspiracy Theorist, Dies at 89 [View all]Major Nikon
(36,922 posts)I mean it would be just as believable. I mean you expect me to believe that just because you've posted this nonsense over and over again, the bullshit becomes less so with each posting. Your link in 2004 just includes another internet regurgitater with absolutely no bullshit filter. And now you hypocritically include an "appeal to authority", which you claim as evidential just because you've rubbed elbows with them (after paying for the privilege no doubt). Not to mention your "top flight researcher" was widely dismissed as a crank among actual top flight book reviewers. How pathetic is that?
And you really expect me to disprove something you never proved to begin with? Let me show you how that level of nonsense works. I have a redphone to the almighty. I picked it up and Jebus himself just said you are 100% full of shit. There you have it from the highest authority. Now prove me wrong! Can't do it? Oh, I must be right then! See how easy that was? Check and mate!
I get that your DU chums are as gullible as you, but that kind of standard of proof just doesn't cut it with people who are capable of cognition.
Also noted is how you don't even attempt to defend your practice of parroting out LaRouche garbage.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):