Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
80. Thank you for pointing that out, KansDem.
Sun May 15, 2016, 06:02 PM
May 2016

The irony of The New York Times using the loaded term in Lane's biography shows that they are so low as to tar the memory of a good man.

Lane did no "theorizing." He stated the facts and let others see them and make of them what they will. That is the Democratic and scientific approach to learning, information, and knowledge, as well as forms the basis for journalism and history.

As a Democrat, a DUer and as a citizen of the United States, I was proud to attend "Passing the Torch: An International Symposium on the 50th Anniversary of the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy" at Duquesne University.

One of the important speakers there I was privileged to meet and hear is Lisa Pease, who discussed "The Covert Corruption of Culture: How Our Reaction to JFK's Assassination and Cover-Up Determines Our Future." A researcher, writer and editor, her presentation examined our information environment and what it means for our selves, our nation, and our planet.



Lisa Pease defined culture as what we experience on a shared basis. She described a talk with a colleague from China who told her about "Hard Power" and "Soft Power." A nation's military and police forces are examples of Hard Power. Soft Power is wielded through the mass media, entertainment industries, and the arts. The latter create culture. And culture shapes belief.

Ms. Pease said she likes to correct inaccuracies in the press and encourages us to do likewise. One egregious example is the treatment afforded the assassination of President Kennedy. Not only have the basic facts and questions around Dallas been misrepresented, information that indicates a conspiracy behind the assassination have been suppressed by the nation's news media. Despite the biased coverage and propaganda, a majority of Americans do not believe the Warren Commission case against Lee Harvey Oswald.

Professional propagandists shape the national information environment. To help We the People preserve democracy, she recommends everyone read "1984" by George Orwell (Eric Arthur Blair).



"That is the best book you all should read, because that is our future if we don't take back what's been done to us in the last, many years. 'Who controls the past, controls the future. Who controls the present, controls the past.' And I'm adding who controls culture, controls the present, because culture shapes our beliefs. Every day, every minute, everything you hear is input, and our brains are just recording it all and making assumptions, rightly or wrongly. The goal of my talk here is to help you make, maybe, better decisions about which inputs to let reach you and maybe when to recognize you are being propagandized. There is a culture war going on, specifically about this issue."



Ms. Pease has worked in the news and entertainment industry. She originally hoped that the assassination of President Kennedy was the result of a lone madman. After starting to research the assassinations of President Kennedy -- and later that of Malcolm X, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., and Robert F. Kennedy -- she realized that the facts indicated conspiracy and that the perpetrators had not been brought to justice. She wanted to talk about her work on the national news media, but after being invited to appear on television, she would see her segments left off of broadcasts. A booking agent explained to her the true picture: "Unless you support the Warren Commission, you will not get on television."

I can personally attest to Ms. Pease's contention regarding biased coverage. In 1993, during the 30th anniversary of the assassination of President Kennedy, I conducted a Content Analysis of New York Times coverage of the assassination anniversary as part of a college program. Using agreement by three coders, we examined the NYT coverage and found fully three-fourths of the paper's space that was devoted to Dallas went to one book, Gerald Posner's "Case Closed" which supported the Warren Commission's findings. Even though many important works were published around that year indicating conspiracy (including "Deep Politics and the Death of JFK" by Peter Dale Scott, "Destiny Betrayed" by James DiEugenio, and "The Last Investigation" by Gaeton Fonzi), they got near-zero coverage in the Paper of Record. In the 20 years since, much new has been learned. The Times, Washington Post and the few networks that produce most of the content Americans hear as news have stuck to the WC line.



"What's at stake are lives, literally lives, are at stake," Ms. Pease said. "By not reporting the truth about the assassination of President Kennedy, the media enabled the assassinations of others. Had the public known about the CIA's roles in coups and assassinations before Kennedy was killed, maybe we would have approached the Warren Report quite a bit differently. And, of course, by not prosecuting the agency for lying to the HSCA (House Select Committee on Assassinations), regardless, regardless -- i'm going to say it a third time -- regardless of whether the CIA was involved in the assassination, by not holding the CIA accountable for lying about anything to Congress is probably the worst mistake this country could make, because we cease to be a democracy when we give up oversight. We do not elect the people in the CIA. We do elect the people in Congress. And that is our only hold on this national security state. We need to hold our elected representatives accountable when they don't hold the national security state accountable. And that goes for all this stuff that's going on today with the NSA revelations. The former NSA director provably lied to Congress, it's right there on video; many of us have actually seen it. It's really important that man be held accountable, that agency be held accountable, because he's not just lying to congress, he's lying to all of us. That's not how democracy functions. These very types of lies that go unchallenged that led us to attack,
literally millions of innocent people in Iraq...These are people who have not done us any harm. Lies are killing people."



Ms. Pease cited several examples of important information that the nation's press have ignored from Kennedy Administration that are relevant for the public to know. Official documents from the CIA itself prove conclusively that President Kennedy and his brother, Attorney General Robert Kennedy, were unaware of CIA-Mafia plots to kill Castro -- assassination plans that began in 1960 under President Eisenhower and DCI Allen Dulles. Yet, the news media continue to repeat the canard that Kennedy ordered the plan. I'm proud to say, we on DU have discussed the Truth -- what Democracy most needs to survive.

Thank you for grokking, Kans Dem. I'd say "Believe it or not," but I really was just about to point out NYT's headline a few minutes ago for a thread above and logged back onto DU. Associative Universe, wot?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Mark Lane opened our eyes, breaking the myths of democracy and freedom our government was meant to Kip Humphrey May 2016 #1
He made an outstanding presentation at the Duquesne conference... Octafish May 2016 #14
The original paperback edition of Mark Lane's "Rush To Judgement " is still on my bookshelf. hedda_foil May 2016 #15
Oh, how I WISHED I had taken the extra day to see him at that conference, Octafish... MrMickeysMom May 2016 #42
Thank you, MrMickeysMom! The People in Pittsburgh are amazing. Octafish May 2016 #58
One of my early hero's... CanSocDem May 2016 #2
Yours is a great memory. Octafish May 2016 #17
Assuredly... CanSocDem May 2016 #23
Mark Lane, Thank You for your contribution, CRH May 2016 #3
A Great Democrat Octafish May 2016 #18
The Mafia-CIA-Cubans-FBI finally got him Freddie Stubbs May 2016 #4
I suspect the real story was he was traveling in a small airplane Major Nikon May 2016 #9
Yeah! Like Paul Wellstone and JFK, Jr. Octafish May 2016 #21
More like like chemtrails and UFOs Major Nikon May 2016 #22
No, more like Nixon and Dulles and Bush. Octafish May 2016 #24
Must be the crop circles Major Nikon May 2016 #25
I admire people who tell the truth. That's why I have a problem with you, Major Nikon. Octafish May 2016 #30
You'll have to excuse my momentary lapses of reason Major Nikon May 2016 #34
No need for disinformation. Octafish May 2016 #101
Then why bring it up? Major Nikon May 2016 #103
DISINFORMATION Part 2: How Trolls Control an Internet Forum Octafish May 2016 #110
Here's your alien abduction post... Major Nikon May 2016 #111
No where do I mention aliens, though. Octafish May 2016 #113
True Major Nikon May 2016 #117
So why do you need to imply I said that? Octafish May 2016 #120
Fair enough Major Nikon May 2016 #122
Never had known this and see it's completely consistant with RN's character. Judi Lynn May 2016 #36
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel May 2016 #29
No. What's ''loony left'' is siding with Karl Rove over Don Siegelman. Octafish May 2016 #41
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel May 2016 #45
After two judges tossed the case, they found a Rove appointee. Octafish May 2016 #77
Lane didn't even mention CIA in ''Rush to Judgement'' Octafish May 2016 #19
Aha, so only 50 years after coming up with his theory, tptb found a way to silence Mr. Lane. FSogol May 2016 #5
Time runs out for all human beings. Octafish May 2016 #20
Excellent book. He refused to believe that a dim-witted former commie, with poor marksmanship, Doctor_J May 2016 #6
I've tried to recreate the shots in christx30 May 2016 #7
Lane said J Edgar Hoover naming Oswald the lone assassin within hours was a sign of cover-up. Octafish May 2016 #31
I bought his book on the assassination and for many years jwirr May 2016 #8
Thank you for sharing that, jwirr. Octafish May 2016 #37
Being homeless is still a problem but finally my daughter has jwirr May 2016 #44
... 2naSalit May 2016 #10
Truly a great American. Some of his accomplishments... Octafish May 2016 #63
Citizen Lane: freedom rider, screenwriter... MinM May 2016 #11
Thanks to his efforts, MinM, we KNOW. Octafish May 2016 #72
Sad Day Mark 750 May 2016 #12
It was a sad day! Octafish May 2016 #78
Rush to Judgment (1966) Youtube complete Ichingcarpenter May 2016 #13
Those are the Stories. Octafish May 2016 #81
Cross gently, Mark. Cooley Hurd May 2016 #16
Thank you, Cooley Hurd. Octafish May 2016 #83
I am now conviinced the kill shot came from the car behind, the agent with the gun that Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #26
There is a movie about it on Netflix? longship May 2016 #27
Pretty clear what happened... Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #61
I know. Lee Harvey Oswald shot JFK. longship May 2016 #68
He was shot from the car behind him? Are you serious? Bucky May 2016 #33
This is the gun that killed him Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #62
Mark Lane reported the truth. He did not add noise. Octafish May 2016 #48
Only 89? hmmm...sounds suspicious to me Adenoid_Hynkel May 2016 #28
Actually, it took Mark Lane years to document the CIA - MAFIA Murder Inc. relationship. Octafish May 2016 #84
Can GHWBush account for his whereabouts when these alleged "natural causes" occurred? Bucky May 2016 #32
You have the right idea, just the wrong suspects Major Nikon May 2016 #35
Here's who to suspect: Those who've spent the last 52 years covering it up, the BFEE. Octafish May 2016 #38
That's actually a pretty brilliant plan Major Nikon May 2016 #39
But that's not what the post was about. Here's something else to know, Dude... Octafish May 2016 #40
Yep, nothing like a dose of John Hankey Major Nikon May 2016 #43
Is that why John McAdams archived that thread? Octafish May 2016 #46
I have no idea why a wingnut would "archive" one of your unrelated posts Major Nikon May 2016 #47
I posted fact. You post straw men and ad hominem. Octafish May 2016 #49
No, what you posted came from John Hankey who is an anti-Semite Major Nikon May 2016 #50
Appeal to authority now. Octafish May 2016 #53
WTF are you even talking about? Major Nikon May 2016 #55
Your smears, threats and distortions. Octafish May 2016 #57
Diversion noted Major Nikon May 2016 #59
That is a despicable thing to write. Octafish May 2016 #60
Promoting the LaRouche movement is pretty fucking despicable Major Nikon May 2016 #64
Don't get all frothy, Major Nikon. Those are the FBI documents. Octafish May 2016 #65
You have such patience. CanSocDem May 2016 #66
CIA is still up to its old shenanigans. Octafish May 2016 #70
Why don't you just say "my dog ate my proof"? Major Nikon May 2016 #67
Because it wouldn't be true. Octafish May 2016 #69
By all means keep on promoting the work of anti-Semites if that's what does it for you Major Nikon May 2016 #71
Nice smear. If I was an ''anti-Semite" interested in ''butthurt" I'd be long gone from DU. Octafish May 2016 #73
I didn't claim you were an anti-Semite Major Nikon May 2016 #74
You also defend Bush & Cheney Octafish May 2016 #75
Bullshit Major Nikon May 2016 #76
Be sure to put this in your memoire. Octafish May 2016 #82
You flatter yourself Major Nikon May 2016 #85
How droll. Octafish May 2016 #86
I think you're worried about how close I'm getting to what you're really about Major Nikon May 2016 #92
Smears all up and down this thread, but what bothers me most... Octafish May 2016 #99
I tell you what Major Nikon May 2016 #102
What do you think you've been doing up and down this thread? Octafish May 2016 #115
Your post was alereted on! cleanhippie May 2016 #87
His journal is filled with him parroting out one of the founders of the LaRouche movement Major Nikon May 2016 #90
Smear by association. Octafish May 2016 #93
217 results Major Nikon May 2016 #96
So those who chronicle the crimes of the Bush family are a problem for you. Nice. Octafish May 2016 #98
For those that don't know, Webster Tarpley was involved in the LaRouche movement for decades Major Nikon May 2016 #104
Please do. The defenders of the Warren Report say, "Case closed." I don't. Octafish May 2016 #91
Lol. It was only because of the silly alert that I was drug into this. cleanhippie May 2016 #94
Laugh all you want. Octafish May 2016 #97
Why do you keep parroting out works from LaRouche's Executive Intelligence Review? Major Nikon May 2016 #105
Show where I'm ''a fan'' or link to anything of that. Octafish May 2016 #107
You didn't answer the question Major Nikon May 2016 #108
I don't have to do anything you demand, on DU or anywhere. Octafish May 2016 #118
True, you don't have to provide evidence of any of your smears Major Nikon May 2016 #124
Jury results cleanhippie May 2016 #95
Evidence of Octafish's fondness for LaRouche Major Nikon May 2016 #100
My reputation matters to me. Octafish May 2016 #106
So why do you keep parroting out works from LaRouche's Executive Intelligence Review? Major Nikon May 2016 #109
You are so right. 14 years on DU. Octafish May 2016 #112
So I'm smearing you with the very material you are posting yourself Major Nikon May 2016 #114
You smear me and I'm supposed to do what you demand? Octafish May 2016 #116
I've yet to see you post the slightest proof I've ever expressed fondness for Bush or Cheney Major Nikon May 2016 #119
Defend. Octafish May 2016 #121
And you've done both Major Nikon May 2016 #123
Call me names or a Larouchie, I don't care. Octafish May 2016 #125
Obviously you do care Major Nikon May 2016 #126
Not really. I side with Mark Lane. You side with Bush and Cheney, Major Nikon. Octafish May 2016 #127
No, really Major Nikon May 2016 #128
Like self-referential posts. Octafish May 2016 #129
Sure, I'm smearing you with your own posts Major Nikon May 2016 #130
Actually, that shows me using the truth to slam the BFEE. Octafish May 2016 #131
If your "truth" was as rock solid as you claim, why go to LaRouche to get it? Major Nikon May 2016 #132
Why do you spend so much time smearing me and defending Bush, Major Nikon? Octafish May 2016 #134
Pointing out that LaRouche is a batshit crazy anti-Semite = "defending Bush" Major Nikon May 2016 #135
But you were calling me an anti-Semite Larouche supporter all over upthread. Octafish May 2016 #136
Bullshit Major Nikon May 2016 #137
Maybe not a good time to mention it, but you're repeating yourself. Octafish May 2016 #138
You stole my line! Major Nikon May 2016 #139
No. I've used alert probably six or seven times in 55,000 posts or whatever it is. Octafish May 2016 #142
There should be a warning before posting the Cheney/Rumsfeld photo! Judi Lynn May 2016 #52
Sorry about that photo. It connects evil from 1963 to 2016. Octafish May 2016 #54
I remember listening to him when I was quite young gopiscrap May 2016 #51
Thank you for sharing those memories, gopiscrap. Octafish May 2016 #88
thanks for posting this gopiscrap May 2016 #141
I heard him speak at the University of Minnesota at least 40 years ago. dflprincess May 2016 #56
Thank you for sharing those memories, dflprincess. Octafish May 2016 #89
And thank you for all your research dflprincess May 2016 #140
NYT calls Lane a "conspiracy theorist?" KansDem May 2016 #79
Thank you for pointing that out, KansDem. Octafish May 2016 #80
The effects of propaganda on display. CanSocDem May 2016 #133
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2020 #143
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Mark Lane, Early Kennedy ...»Reply #80