Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Connecticut court reverses conviction of Michael Skakel [View all]pnwmom
(110,122 posts)15. You should look stuff up before you post. Michael was a scrawny 120 pound kid.
And he was the one convicted, not his bigger older brother or the tutor, an adult who was also in the area and much stronger than Michael.
Also, there was a white hair, pulled out by the root, on the victim's body. That didn't come from a 15 year old.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
102 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

My wife and I disagree on this - she thinks he did it, I think he was railroaded.
George II
May 2018
#1
I'm not saying this about your wife, of course, but I think a lot of the guilters
pnwmom
May 2018
#2
Who else could it be? There were lots of people around that night, but how about
pnwmom
May 2018
#67
Yeah they tried to convince the cops the tutor did it...but there was never any evidence...
Demsrule86
May 2018
#73
That's what I told her about 15 minutes ago. The thing is he's not even a real "Kennedy"....
George II
May 2018
#8
Love the Kennedys, still think Skankel is guilty as hell. Also think that twelve years is enough....
marble falls
May 2018
#40
There is truth in that...had he been caught at the time...I doubt he would have spent that long in
Demsrule86
May 2018
#62
Most likely true. All that waste, starting with the victim, dodging justice.
marble falls
May 2018
#82
The family stonewalled...and I can't blame them...I don't think I would ever turn in one of my kids
Demsrule86
May 2018
#83
I don't know that I would turn them in past hiring an attorney who would then...
marble falls
May 2018
#85
I think they maybemighthavepossibly gotten the wrong Skakel. One out of five chance.
marble falls
May 2018
#87
The two boys were the proper age...the older one passed a lie detector test.
Demsrule86
May 2018
#94
You can't go by that...the family and police wanted it to be him...but he was seen at the time the
Demsrule86
May 2018
#98
I thought myself when I read this that although I think he is guilty maybe he didn't receive a
Demsrule86
May 2018
#63
I am not saying it is not important...but I do think he is guilty...and maybe with modern forensics,
Demsrule86
May 2018
#93
Ok, correction noted. But he was a skinny kid -- the size of my 12 year olds. n/t
pnwmom
May 2018
#9
Skakel (who wasn't a Kennedy) was 120 pounds at 15. When I was 12, I was 5 feet 6 and 120 pounds.
pnwmom
May 2018
#18
Right. Also, I doubt if he wasn't connected to the Kennedys that there would have been
pnwmom
May 2018
#23
He is said to have confessed during his 4th and 5th steps in Alcoholics Anonymous.
Lil Missy
May 2018
#24
It's irrelevant. Masturbating in a tree isn't murder, and it doesn't place him at the scene.
pnwmom
May 2018
#38
No it doesn't. 12 years in jail is enough, innocent or guilty. There is no way at this point to ...
marble falls
May 2018
#100
I hope they won't bother with another trial. Between the lack of forensic or eyewitness evidence,
pnwmom
May 2018
#28
Then you know about Dominick Dunne's unhinged campaign to influence public opinion
pnwmom
May 2018
#36
What? He beat a girl to death with a gulf club...and confessed multiple times in various places.
Demsrule86
May 2018
#46
They first suspected his brother. The golf club came from the house...it was because He confessed
Demsrule86
May 2018
#51
Actually, he refused to testify about it...and I don't trust him. You have to understand
Demsrule86
May 2018
#58
This has nothing to do with the Kennedys ...the Skakels hads a bad reputation even when Ethel
Demsrule86
May 2018
#60
It didn't have to be a Skakel. Lots of people had access to the golf clubs in the open garage.
pnwmom
May 2018
#64
Yeah they tried to pin it on the tutor. do you think a stranger would not have been noticed?
Demsrule86
May 2018
#66
Yes. The reason Littleton was called to testify is because FIRST he told the state investigator
pnwmom
May 2018
#76
She was found in an empty lot ...which was frequented by what passes for criminals in Greenwich...
Demsrule86
May 2018
#84
No new DNA evidence but a disinterested alibi witness who wasn't interviewed for the first trial. n/
pnwmom
May 2018
#69
It was a lazy or incompetent attorney. He didn't notice that in the Grand Jury transcript
pnwmom
May 2018
#71
Doesn't matter. It's over. The majority disagreed, and this opinion will benefit
pnwmom
May 2018
#80
Dorthy Moxley: "I have no doubts at all that Michael Skakel is the one who murdered my daughter"
melman
May 2018
#78
She's thought so ever since the first trial. It means nothing. Meredith Kercher's parents
pnwmom
May 2018
#79