Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Connecticut court reverses conviction of Michael Skakel [View all]pnwmom
(110,122 posts)28. I hope they won't bother with another trial. Between the lack of forensic or eyewitness evidence,
and the presence of a disinterested alibi witness, and the logic problems (e.g., how a 120 boy dragged or carried a 120 pound body almost a hundred yards), I think they're going to have trouble finding guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
102 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

My wife and I disagree on this - she thinks he did it, I think he was railroaded.
George II
May 2018
#1
I'm not saying this about your wife, of course, but I think a lot of the guilters
pnwmom
May 2018
#2
Who else could it be? There were lots of people around that night, but how about
pnwmom
May 2018
#67
Yeah they tried to convince the cops the tutor did it...but there was never any evidence...
Demsrule86
May 2018
#73
That's what I told her about 15 minutes ago. The thing is he's not even a real "Kennedy"....
George II
May 2018
#8
Love the Kennedys, still think Skankel is guilty as hell. Also think that twelve years is enough....
marble falls
May 2018
#40
There is truth in that...had he been caught at the time...I doubt he would have spent that long in
Demsrule86
May 2018
#62
Most likely true. All that waste, starting with the victim, dodging justice.
marble falls
May 2018
#82
The family stonewalled...and I can't blame them...I don't think I would ever turn in one of my kids
Demsrule86
May 2018
#83
I don't know that I would turn them in past hiring an attorney who would then...
marble falls
May 2018
#85
I think they maybemighthavepossibly gotten the wrong Skakel. One out of five chance.
marble falls
May 2018
#87
The two boys were the proper age...the older one passed a lie detector test.
Demsrule86
May 2018
#94
You can't go by that...the family and police wanted it to be him...but he was seen at the time the
Demsrule86
May 2018
#98
I thought myself when I read this that although I think he is guilty maybe he didn't receive a
Demsrule86
May 2018
#63
I am not saying it is not important...but I do think he is guilty...and maybe with modern forensics,
Demsrule86
May 2018
#93
Ok, correction noted. But he was a skinny kid -- the size of my 12 year olds. n/t
pnwmom
May 2018
#9
Skakel (who wasn't a Kennedy) was 120 pounds at 15. When I was 12, I was 5 feet 6 and 120 pounds.
pnwmom
May 2018
#18
Right. Also, I doubt if he wasn't connected to the Kennedys that there would have been
pnwmom
May 2018
#23
He is said to have confessed during his 4th and 5th steps in Alcoholics Anonymous.
Lil Missy
May 2018
#24
It's irrelevant. Masturbating in a tree isn't murder, and it doesn't place him at the scene.
pnwmom
May 2018
#38
No it doesn't. 12 years in jail is enough, innocent or guilty. There is no way at this point to ...
marble falls
May 2018
#100
I hope they won't bother with another trial. Between the lack of forensic or eyewitness evidence,
pnwmom
May 2018
#28
Then you know about Dominick Dunne's unhinged campaign to influence public opinion
pnwmom
May 2018
#36
What? He beat a girl to death with a gulf club...and confessed multiple times in various places.
Demsrule86
May 2018
#46
They first suspected his brother. The golf club came from the house...it was because He confessed
Demsrule86
May 2018
#51
Actually, he refused to testify about it...and I don't trust him. You have to understand
Demsrule86
May 2018
#58
This has nothing to do with the Kennedys ...the Skakels hads a bad reputation even when Ethel
Demsrule86
May 2018
#60
It didn't have to be a Skakel. Lots of people had access to the golf clubs in the open garage.
pnwmom
May 2018
#64
Yeah they tried to pin it on the tutor. do you think a stranger would not have been noticed?
Demsrule86
May 2018
#66
Yes. The reason Littleton was called to testify is because FIRST he told the state investigator
pnwmom
May 2018
#76
She was found in an empty lot ...which was frequented by what passes for criminals in Greenwich...
Demsrule86
May 2018
#84
No new DNA evidence but a disinterested alibi witness who wasn't interviewed for the first trial. n/
pnwmom
May 2018
#69
It was a lazy or incompetent attorney. He didn't notice that in the Grand Jury transcript
pnwmom
May 2018
#71
Doesn't matter. It's over. The majority disagreed, and this opinion will benefit
pnwmom
May 2018
#80
Dorthy Moxley: "I have no doubts at all that Michael Skakel is the one who murdered my daughter"
melman
May 2018
#78
She's thought so ever since the first trial. It means nothing. Meredith Kercher's parents
pnwmom
May 2018
#79