Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Connecticut court reverses conviction of Michael Skakel [View all]pnwmom
(110,122 posts)be sure what happened that night, because of his drinking, but he had no memory of killing her. And there was a disinterested alibi witness, a witness the magistrate judge said was "highly credible" who said he was NOT there on the night of the crime -- that he was watching TV with a group of young people, in a house miles away. (Where he told police he thought he was.)
Unfortunately, his original attorney didn't bother to interview the witness or call him to trial, which is why the conviction has now been overturned.
Also, there was zero forensic evidence linking him to the crime (although they found a white hair with a root on her body), no eyewitnesses, and the prosecution's claim was that the 120 pound boy dragged the 120 pound body almost a hundred yards. Meanwhile, there were other much stronger adult men around that night who could have been guilty -- but the police for some reason picked out the skinny kid.
So this man spent over a dozen years in prison for a crime in which there was a great deal of reasonable doubt.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):