Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Biden Says Climate Change Poses Greater Threat Than Nuclear War [View all]Martin68
(22,900 posts)18. No, the rich and "powerful" will not survive. Rising sea levels, droughts, floods, hurricanes,
and wildfires will result in mass migrations and millions of refugees that will destabilize every society on Earth. The wealthy depend on the stock market and real estate. Those will both prove useless against the catastrophes that climate change will bring. We're already getting a preview of what's to come, but the temperature is still rising. if we don't start a mass movement for change, no one is safe. The poor will suffer first, but the consequences will affect everybody and everything.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
59 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Biden Says Climate Change Poses Greater Threat Than Nuclear War [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Sep 2023
OP
No, a nuclear war is not "obviously" the wost catastrophe in our future. In fact, it would not have
Martin68
Sep 2023
#19
The rich and powerful will survive (While being the biggest drivers of climate change too)
ck4829
Sep 2023
#6
No, the rich and "powerful" will not survive. Rising sea levels, droughts, floods, hurricanes,
Martin68
Sep 2023
#18
They cannot 'eat' gold, or fish if there are none left in the warming oceans.
Justice matters.
Sep 2023
#21
You cannot adapt to the collapse of our biosphere. No water No food No people
airplaneman
Sep 2023
#12
You're missing the flow stock problem. CO2 resides in the atmosphere for 1000 years give or take.
mahina
Sep 2023
#55
Because todays nukes are about 100x more powerful than those dropped on Japan.
oldsoftie
Sep 2023
#15
This is absolutely true, and I've been disappointed that some on DU are still not taking the threat
Martin68
Sep 2023
#17
Depends on how you look at it as in the short-term nuclear war is far more dangerous as climate
cstanleytech
Sep 2023
#23
"Depends on how you look at it as in the short-term nuclear war is far more dangerous as climate"
BumRushDaShow
Sep 2023
#25
Those are all minor things in the short-term compared an all out nuclear war.
cstanleytech
Sep 2023
#32
I haven't even touched the surface of the extreme weather events this year
BumRushDaShow
Sep 2023
#41
Only in the short-term as more than likely at least some of our species would survive a nuclear war.
cstanleytech
Sep 2023
#33
How much of a difference would the long term radiation be from what's around Chernobyl?
cstanleytech
Sep 2023
#38
This is pure speculation, however, since nuclear wars have not been observed since 1945...
NNadir
Sep 2023
#42
One yr ago: "Biden calls the prospect of Armageddon' the highest since the Cuban missile crisis."l
womanofthehills
Sep 2023
#49
Climate change is out of the tube and something humanity has no choice but to adapt.
PufPuf23
Sep 2023
#56