Latest Breaking News

Botany

(72,111 posts)

38. Lavrov said the United States and NATO were obsessed with the idea of inflicting "strategic defeat" on Russia.

Reply to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)

Tue Apr 23, 2024, 09:12 AM

Apr 2024

Yes Sergi, the good guys want to see the Russians defeated and driven from Ukraine, the
Russian People and the Russian Military rise up and take their country back, and a bullet to
Vlad’s brain pan is a good idea too. You have kidnapped, murdered, raped, and made homeless
probably over a million Ukrainian People have gotten killed at least1/4 of a million Russian
troops, civilians, sailors, and others too.

The only real question is which side the American Republicans will be on? Traitors that that
they are deserve shame and to be driven from government.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Russia warns of direct clash with West over Ukraine [View all] Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 2024 OP

Which will be worse for Russia than NATO IronLionZion Apr 2024 #1

Lavrov can go pound sand. Ray Bruns Apr 2024 #2

... ruet Apr 2024 #3

Sergey, you've been hitting the wodka too hard again, bro. lastlib Apr 2024 #4

The sound of constant threats from Russia and the Amercian GQPs.................... Lovie777 Apr 2024 #5

My guess is this is a diplomatic tantrum sparked Torchlight Apr 2024 #6

Accurate guess jimfields33 Apr 2024 #13

You can add to that the US REPO Act and similar European moves to divert frozen Russian funds to Ukraine Emrys Apr 2024 #22

Russia can't beat Ukraine but wants to challenge NATO. The only thing he could do is use nukes and that would be MAD. Chainfire Apr 2024 #7

Trump and Pope Francis are eagerly trying to fill the role of Neville Chamberlain. nt Gore1FL Apr 2024 #9

"The only thing he could do is use nukes ." Yes. speak easy Apr 2024 #26

Russia and China are the counties pushing the world in that direction. cstanleytech Apr 2024 #8

Dear Pootie-poot: oasis Apr 2024 #10

More empty threats! PortTack Apr 2024 #11

I doubt if it's an empty threat if Crimea is envolved womanofthehills Apr 2024 #14

The ATCAMS we are going to send them are for more long range, so the US military knows the Kersch bridge PortTack Apr 2024 #15

So, if Russia invaded the US, would we be willing to give up Alaska in the interest of peace? TomSlick Apr 2024 #20

Crimea is involved Emrys Apr 2024 #23

We know republicons would LOVE to surrender Ukraine to pootin RandiFan1290 Apr 2024 #33

The unmitigated gall LiberalLovinLug Apr 2024 #12

Exactly!! PortTack Apr 2024 #16

All hat and no cattle. MarineCombatEngineer Apr 2024 #17

Old news. What else is new? onetexan Apr 2024 #18

so what... myohmy2 Apr 2024 #19

Promises, promises... JoseBalow Apr 2024 #21

Guess who loses orangecrush Apr 2024 #24

Ooh, ooh, I know, MarineCombatEngineer Apr 2024 #25

Chicken dinner orangecrush Apr 2024 #40

Yawn (not at you for posting it but for Lavrov's stupidity). Elessar Zappa Apr 2024 #27

More saber rattling from Poot-poot? sakabatou Apr 2024 #28

No doubt Russia has enough functional nukes to turn large parts of the globe into slagheaps. Aussie105 Apr 2024 #29

Our military has all scenarios covered. Their whole posture is Shakespearean. ancianita Apr 2024 #30

Considering how neglectful he was of the Russian miliary, Putin shouldn't be sure of that JHB Apr 2024 #32

Would rather "clash with Russia" over Ukraine than no_hypocrisy Apr 2024 #31

he's just pissed that his repuke assest are dimwits. LOL nt Javaman Apr 2024 #34

More empty threats? Happy Hoosier Apr 2024 #35

! Marcuse Apr 2024 #36

That was early on Trump's term Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 2024 #37

Lavrov said the United States and NATO were obsessed with the idea of inflicting "strategic defeat" on Russia. Botany Apr 2024 #38

I don't believe Putin would survive a battle with NATO. the_sly_pig Apr 2024 #39