That is what the US does in Haiti and in the 1960s Vietnam. It provides a wonderful Democratic Government, like the one in 1960 South Africa, another "Democratic" Country, but one that restricted the vote to people who would vote the way the people in the Government wanted them to vote.
The Soviet Union was a Democratic Country, everyone could vote, for or against the Communist party. If you voted for the party no problem, if you voted against the party, you would be asked not only why but also "how could you do such a anti-revolutionary act, you traitor".
Democracy means the people, ALL OF THE PEOPLE, can vote for who they want. Under Mubarak that was NOT possible.
More on Haiti and its exclusion of the Largest Political Party in Haiti from the election:
http://www.thenation.com/article/161216/wikileaks-haiti-cable-depicts-fraudulent-haiti-election#
The absence of the Fanmi Lavalas (FL) party was notable because of its popular support. Peter Hallward[14] explained: "The final FL list of candidates was endorsed by the party leader (Jean Bertrand Aristide) by fax, but at the last minute the CEP invented a new requirement, knowing FL would be unable to meet it: Aristide, still exiled in South Africa and denied entry to Haiti, would have to sign the list in person."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haitian_general_election,_2010%E2%80%932011
Since the party they supported was NOT on the ballot, 80% of the Haiti voters did not even bother to vote (more a boycott to protest the lack of ability to vote for whom they wanted to vote).
The election in South Vietnam were similar, the US opposed the proposed 1955 vote which all sides (but the US) had agreed to in the 1954 treaty that ended the French Indo-China war. Due to US opposition the election never took place (the US suspected the South would vote to merge with the Communist North in the election). Subsequent elections in South Vietnam had the same effect, the people of Vietnam had their choice of which candidates that were permitted on the ballot, the communist could NOT even get on the ballot (for the reason, many suspected they would win).
The Soviet Union had a similar Track record, making sure the election had no one on it that was NOT a member of the Communist Party.
These were NOT viewed as "Democratic" Elections but Frauds, the same with the elections in Egypt under Mubarak, he won so many fraudulent elections it is almost funny. When the Moslem Brotherhood almost won, one year, he just banned them from running, thus cutting them out of 1/2 of all elections (Egypt elections are two fold, individual districts AND vote by party, 1/2 the members of Parliament are elected each way. By banning the Moslem Brotherhood Mubarak made sure they could NEVER get control of the Egyptian Parliament, thus would ALWAYS be in the minority. Thus Egypt was no where near as Democratic as it is now, where 75% of the votes produce 75% of the members of Parliament.
= new reply since forum marked as read