There has been is no shortage of people on our side of the isle claiming otherwise over the years.
Getting back to the origin of my first reply. The article is hyperbole. The author is making claims that simply aren’t true. All it does is panic people based on the authors distorted view behind the purpose of the rule. The rule is plainly written. Easy to understand. There is plenty to hate when it comes to the present administration. From my point of view, this will be a minor inconvenience at the worst. I don’t really feel I have anything more to say on the subject. I will leave you with a few links though.
Notice the dates. https://www.ice.gov/news/releases/106-defendants-indicted-social-security-disability-fraud-costing-federal-taxpayers
https://oig.ssa.gov/news-releases/2020-07-29-audits-and-investigations-investigations-july29-fl-eleven-individuals-operation-dead-ringer/
https://www.aarp.org/money/scams-fraud/man-deposits-dead-aunt-social-security/
https://oig.ssa.gov/news-releases/2021-11-26-appleton-man-sentenced-to-prison-for-defrauding-social-security-of-over-73-500-in-supplemental-security-income-benefits/
https://www.ussc.gov/research/quick-facts/government-benefits-fraud
Shall I continue? That took about a minute. Have a great day. Try to find something good out here. 
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
= new reply since forum marked as read