Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I have been saying that the states who he moves against should do something like this. OldBaldy1701E Jul 5 #1
I don't know if it's legal but it's worth a try. COL Mustard Jul 5 #21
It definitely doesn't sound legal, but it can at least delay and maybe deny state funds to an asset ancianita Jul 5 #35
They can drag their feet like tfg, tie it up in courts and not comply with the rulings.. What are they gonna do, sue? mitch96 Jul 5 #46
They'll grab him off the street and send him to Justice matters. Jul 5 #51
Exactly. (n/t) OldBaldy1701E Jul 6 #61
I don't see how that would work FBaggins Jul 5 #2
They would just move their assets. Hornedfrog2000 Jul 5 #3
OUR ASSETS! BidenRocks Jul 5 #38
Can the garnish income from the properties? Scrivener7 Jul 5 #6
can't they prevent the government from accessing their properties? LymphocyteLover Jul 5 #7
No. In fact the Biden administration proved this FBaggins Jul 5 #12
The "Liens on their property" is more of an analogy/euphemistic term BumRushDaShow Jul 5 #9
The example given is awful FBaggins Jul 5 #13
"Withholding payroll taxes for state employees screws the employees" BumRushDaShow Jul 5 #17
Not a crime at all. There's no federal statute mandating the process whereby withholding makes its way to the Feds. paleotn Jul 5 #27
Let me clarify - the employees are not screwed Klaus Hergersheimer Jul 5 #31
Welcome to DU LetMyPeopleVote Jul 6 #62
Exactly, good info Farmer-Rick Jul 5 #18
I wrote the following downthread BumRushDaShow Jul 5 #24
Thanks for the info. Farmer-Rick Jul 5 #26
In theory they could foreclose Nasruddin Jul 5 #30
Isnt selling off public lands one of the many problems in the dump bill? quakerboy Jul 5 #55
That part was dropped a few days ago FBaggins Jul 5 #57
Nice idea but Supreme Court will eventually intervene against states. Is K-9 funding mandated by congress? lostnfound Jul 5 #4
The education funding was mandated by Congress, yes LymphocyteLover Jul 5 #8
How would retaliation from pedo Trump actually work? Farmer-Rick Jul 5 #23
How would the states get the employer to give them the money instead of it being sent directly to the US Treasury? MichMan Jul 5 #49
Aside from regular state taxes you mean? Farmer-Rick Jul 5 #50
I didn't see any specifics in the OP about what type of state payments would be held. MichMan Jul 5 #54
Google is helpful BumRushDaShow Jul 5 #58
The "employer" in this case is *THE STATE* BumRushDaShow Jul 5 #53
See paleotn response to that upthread. Dixiegrrrl Jul 5 #29
Turn off utilities. Historic NY Jul 5 #5
This has been tried before, didn't work. DUU Jul 5 #10
Welcome to DU orangecrush Jul 5 #15
Got a link on that? NJCher Jul 5 #19
There is nothing in that article, nor an earlier NBC one, that says anything about "federal property". BumRushDaShow Jul 5 #20
That doesn't sound like the same thing Farmer-Rick Jul 5 #25
Schlump definitely has some form of dementia. ShazzieB Jul 6 #60
Good strategy. You play the game presented to you, and stand tall. /.nt bucolic_frolic Jul 5 #11
YES orangecrush Jul 5 #14
If it's a "secret weapon" why announce it? NoMoreRepugs Jul 5 #16
I think the term "secret" is more "slang" than literal. BumRushDaShow Jul 5 #22
I need a "rhetorical question" emoji. NoMoreRepugs Jul 5 #40
DUer tanyev uses this BumRushDaShow Jul 5 #42
Writers NJCher Jul 5 #37
I say "YES" let's do it!! h2ebits Jul 5 #28
Trump's properties maliaSmith Jul 5 #32
Fight the POWER!!! sunflowerseed Jul 5 #33
Isn't this legally just a series of setoffs? rzemanfl Jul 5 #34
I'm for it hope California does it. republianmushroom Jul 5 #36
The Fed may have the bldg or whatever, BidenRocks Jul 5 #39
I don't think this has to do with what they call "real property" (buildings) BumRushDaShow Jul 5 #41
Please see my post #34 above regarding setoff. rzemanfl Jul 5 #43
I saw it BumRushDaShow Jul 5 #48
Newsom is considering doing something similar... AntiFascist Jul 5 #44
I am glad they are exploring ways to shift money to their own state from the fed mdbl Jul 5 #45
Excelent idea! Josiesdad Jul 5 #47
This is part of what I see as a soft secession Metaphorical Jul 5 #52
This is soveirgn citizen tactics. Jacson6 Jul 5 #56
Problem is BumRushDaShow Jul 5 #59
Right you are BRDS - the executive branch is provoking Blue States into "getting even" as the only option left FakeNoose Jul 6 #63
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»'Liens on their property'...»Reply #33