Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Trump Says He Will Order Voter ID Requirement For Every Vote [View all]BumRushDaShow
(159,319 posts)59. When PA attempted to implement Voter ID back in 2012
it wasn't "free". There was even this smarmy ass who has since exited the state Legislature, who touted it as their ticket to Romney winning PA -
The cost of the birth certificate alone (at least for PA residents at the time) was $9. And good luck if you were resident of PA but born in another state in a rural area in the early part of the 20th century and they can't find your birth certificate or there was none - maybe just a notation in a bible.
All of this landed in the 2012 lawsuit filed by-then 93 year old Viviette Applewhite in Applewhite, et al. v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al.
From here - https://www.aclupa.org/news/remembering-voting-rights-champion/
(snip)
Pennsylvanias 2012 law required one of very few types of photo identification. In reality, unless you had a drivers license or non-driver state ID, you likely didnt have the ID required to vote. Ludicrously, even a veterans picture ID, issued by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, didnt suffice.
To get a state-issued ID in the post-9/11 security-enhanced world, you needed an original birth certificate and social security card, and the names had to match perfectly. Women were disproportionately affected by this requirement because they more often changed names with marriage. In that case, they also needed an original marriage certificate.
African-Americans, especially those born in the South, were also severely affected. Especially during the Jim Crow era, many Black people werent born in hospitals, and if they were, most hospitals did not prioritize keeping birth records for them. Viviette and her nine fellow plaintiffs in the lawsuit were representative of people without the required IDs who would have a difficult, if not impossible, time obtaining the needed ID.
(snip)
Pennsylvanias 2012 law required one of very few types of photo identification. In reality, unless you had a drivers license or non-driver state ID, you likely didnt have the ID required to vote. Ludicrously, even a veterans picture ID, issued by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, didnt suffice.
To get a state-issued ID in the post-9/11 security-enhanced world, you needed an original birth certificate and social security card, and the names had to match perfectly. Women were disproportionately affected by this requirement because they more often changed names with marriage. In that case, they also needed an original marriage certificate.
African-Americans, especially those born in the South, were also severely affected. Especially during the Jim Crow era, many Black people werent born in hospitals, and if they were, most hospitals did not prioritize keeping birth records for them. Viviette and her nine fellow plaintiffs in the lawsuit were representative of people without the required IDs who would have a difficult, if not impossible, time obtaining the needed ID.
(snip)
It was basically declared a "poll tax" (violation of the 24th Amendment), and the GOP loons kept modifying it and modifying it to reduce the requirements and then offer a "free ID". But ultimately, a stay was put on the law ahead of the 2012 election, and the law was mooted a couple years after the election when the GOP loon governor chose not to appeal.
Then he was voted out and lost a 2nd term and a GOP governor has, so far, not been elected since his election in 2011 (breaking a long "tradition" of the office alternating parties).
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
95 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

I don't believe he can do this, elections are set up and controlled by each state...
wcmagumba
Sunday
#2
Wait until a Dem is President again,the Extreme court will be reviewing that ruling ASAP
Bengus81
Sunday
#50
"Voter I.D. Must Be Part of Every Single Vote. NO EXCEPTIONS!" Now WHERE have I HEARD that BEFORE?
Miles Archer
Sunday
#17
One would think Republicans would question why their party always tries to prevent Americans from voting.
travelingthrulife
Sunday
#26
I realize that it is his idea to make people not vote due to long lines and bad weather, but what about early voting?
LiberalArkie
Sunday
#27
Yes, me also. But I live in rural Arkansas and mail is iffy. Depends on the contractor delivering. So I would never
LiberalArkie
Sunday
#37
when we vote here in New Haven, our names are checked off a list of registered voters. It's no problem if you go at
CTyankee
Sunday
#31
Ultimately, the Supreme Court is re-writing the Constitution, just for Trump.
thought crime
Sunday
#40
He can shove that EO up his shit filled ass. When it comes to voting he has no say.
Autumn
Sunday
#39
That's what people thought when he signed an E.O. to eliminate "birthright citizenship"
BumRushDaShow
Sunday
#64
Executive orders apply to the Executive Branch, Donnie. They have no legal impact on the states
rsdsharp
Sunday
#63
They whined excessively about Obama's "executve actions" (as they dubbed them)
BumRushDaShow
Sunday
#75
And the asshole that always voted by mail got a brainworm idea from VLAD. Traitor-in-Chief. nt
Evolve Dammit
Sunday
#73
State boards of elections control and manage their own elections. SHitler has nothing to say about it.
CousinIT
Sunday
#78
He has no authority to do so. Zero. Nada. Bupkis. Miller and Thiel are lying to him again.
Ford_Prefect
Sunday
#87