Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Donald Trump Sued Over East Wing Demolition [View all]underpants
(193,591 posts)52. I agree. I think they are hiding behind "private donations"
saying no government money is being used. Its still National Parks land and some government money has to be being used because its on public land.
I work in procurement on a much smaller scale but we still have a process for any contract.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Pretty sad though it has to be private couple doing that. Seriously there are a lot of
Bev54
Saturday
#60
I Don't Believe We Have Ever Seen Any Evidence That This Piece of Detritus Has Ever
The Roux Comes First
Friday
#2
Unfortunately, slightlv...psychopaths are not capable of meaningful introspection
littlemissmartypants
Friday
#20
They need an emergency order to stop all construction--even if it leaves a horrible pile of debris.
hlthe2b
Friday
#5
YES! Let the bad optics just sit there through next year as court battles roll out -- to remind
ancianita
Saturday
#41
Isn't almost everything this administration has done a violation of public trust?
BattleRow
Friday
#8
Bye, bye Washington Monument. I climbed it twice.Used the stairs. Down too, to be clear.
twodogsbarking
Friday
#10
Picking up from the last paragraph of your excerpt ... The freestanding BBC legal take on the matter.
Igel
Friday
#36
We need a massive Class Action lawsuit; it's the People's House he's torn down, we've all been harmed.
sop
Friday
#19
All of those things are required when Congress appropriates funds for something
FBaggins
Saturday
#56
Almost every president has done some modification while occupying the White House.
Deuxcents
Friday
#30
"Not one of them have torn down a structure to make their plan work" Sort of...
EX500rider
20 hrs ago
#70
It was on the verge of collapse; this wasn't the destruction of an existing structure
Ocelot II
19 hrs ago
#77
There is no question it is illegal. The only question is whether we still have any remnant of law and order left in thi
travelingthrulife
Saturday
#51
I am afraid they will not get over the standing hurdle. A class action of the American people vs Trump might.
flashman13
Saturday
#59
Wouldn't just being American taxpayers cause them to have standing? He might have donors lining up
Vinca
20 hrs ago
#71
A single tax payer could bring a suit to prevent their money from funding an illegal project.
flashman13
16 hrs ago
#79