Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bluetus

(1,933 posts)
5. Litmus tests?
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 10:59 AM
Nov 7

Last edited Fri Nov 7, 2025, 11:35 AM - Edit history (1)

I think that is a bit hyperbolic. I haven't seen anything I would call a "litmus test". But I do think that every Dem candidate should be fully committed to a set of policies/changes/progress we want to achieve for our country. There is a list floating around that looks like a very good starting point to me. I'd like to know what is on this list that any Democrat cannot strongly support.

• Overturn Citizens United
• No personal use of PAC money, even after retiring
• Codify Women's Right to Choose
• Term Limits and highest code of ethics for SCOTUS
• Get Rid of the Electoral College
• Outlaw Gerrymandering Nationwide
• Return Fairness Doctrine in Media
• Universal Healthcare for ALL
• Ban Stock Trading While in Congress
• 5 year wait before taking jobs in industries overseen/regulated when in office
• Cap Congress Salary at 1.5x Median Income of Their District
• Tax Billionaires Out of Existence
• Tax Unrealized Gains Used as Loan Collateral
• Tax Mega-Churches involved in political activity
• Raise Federal Minimum Wage to $20/hr
• Eliminate the Presidential pardon privilege

If a candidate cannot enthusiastically support practically all of these things, I wonder why they would even want to run as a Democrat. And if there are some things on this list that the majority of Dems can't strongly support, then take them off the list - for EVERYBODY. It is a simple issue of branding. You know what you are getting when you walk into a Wal*Mart, Applebee's, Apple store, NBA arena or Disney movie. People need to know what a Democrat is and what they can expect from any Democrat they vote for.

One person's "litmus test" is another person's set of core values.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Good advice. We need to return to a 50-state strategy. yardwork Nov 7 #1
Absolutely, return to the 50 state strategy Miguelito Loveless Nov 7 #2
I love Barack and Michelle so much! And he's right! CTyankee Nov 7 #3
Yeah, can't waste too much time celebrating. 2026 starts now... Wounded Bear Nov 7 #4
Litmus tests? Bluetus Nov 7 #5
There is one Litmus test that makes everything on your list possible: Fiendish Thingy Nov 7 #6
I think that's a litmus test. Joinfortmill Nov 7 #13
You think *WHAT* is a litmas test? Bluetus Nov 7 #21
Way to show you believe in litmus tests right after saying you don't. yardwork Nov 7 #24
So you don't support the things on that list? Bluetus Nov 7 #30
I see lions. yardwork Nov 7 #34
And an emoluments clause with teeth Seinan Sensei Nov 7 #26
I think he meant Democrat on Democrat litmus tests padah513 Nov 7 #27
Perhaps that is what he meant. Bluetus Nov 7 #35
That IS a huge litmus test and many of those things very unlikely karynnj Nov 7 #39
Don't negotiate against yourself. Bluetus Nov 7 #47
How many states can you win state wide if you are for all of that? karynnj Nov 7 #48
More than if we don't run on bold ideas Bluetus Nov 7 #51
Mamdani won no thanks to Obama, steventh Nov 7 #7
DID HE? jaymac Nov 7 #10
Apologies, I was mistaken. Obama did not endorse Cuomo. steventh Nov 7 #17
Obama supported Mamdani and called him personally, twice BumRushDaShow Nov 7 #22
I don't think he "endorsed" anyone Bluetus Nov 7 #23
Fortunately neither Obama nor Mamdani are listening to these "concerns." yardwork Nov 7 #32
I know.. it's So Obvious. Cha Nov 7 #45
He didn't. Never thought I'd see alternative facts being spit out in here. padah513 Nov 7 #31
This thread has some atrocious posts. yardwork Nov 7 #33
Um, Obama didn't endorse Cuomo. PSPS Nov 7 #12
Thank you for the correction. steventh Nov 7 #18
Obama did not endorse Cuomo. Joinfortmill Nov 7 #15
You're right. I was mislead, possible by an AI video. steventh Nov 7 #19
Correct your post, then. yardwork Nov 7 #29
It is amazing SocialDemocrat61 Nov 7 #20
There are two separate issues and groups of people. yardwork Nov 7 #28
Right? They need to Get Over That... not Cha Nov 7 #43
Correct this immediately. Obama did not endorse Cuomo. yardwork Nov 7 #25
Pres Obama did NOT "endorse" Cuomo. Cha Nov 7 #40
As an NYC'r pretty sure Mamdani will suround himself w smart people. electric_blue68 Nov 7 #49
Yes, they need to go hard for every congressional seat everywhere. Republicans are responsible Fil1957 Nov 7 #8
we sure miss that guy oldinmtdem92 Nov 7 #9
Ha! Joinfortmill Nov 7 #14
Excellent. We need Obama out there talking. Joinfortmill Nov 7 #11
Yes, please. Barack & Bernie! Every. Day. thought crime Nov 7 #37
Love Obama orangecrush Nov 7 #16
Love them too Joinfortmill Nov 7 #36
That's nice.. Pres Obama has a Lot to Offer Cha Nov 7 #41
Here we go again with a well known & respected Liberal saying KS Toronado Nov 7 #38
It's trickier in the Senate because only 1/3rd of them are up every 2 years BumRushDaShow Nov 7 #42
I see said the blind man KS Toronado Nov 7 #44
"Glad when this is all over." BumRushDaShow Nov 7 #46
Oh, desr. Good luck! electric_blue68 Nov 7 #50
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Barack Obama Gives Crucia...»Reply #5