Latest Breaking News

samplegirl

(13,606 posts)

14. They have been

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 18, 2025, 03:35 PM

Nov 18

Scrubbed!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

UT_democrat duckworth969 Wednesdays

68 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

House overwhelmingly passes bill to release Jeffrey Epstein files [View all] BumRushDaShow Nov 18 OP

Almost unanimous... 427-1, 5 abstaining. ancianita Nov 18 #1

No shit?! RussBLib Nov 18 #2

No shit! Here's the link. ancianita Nov 18 #5

Well Trump told them is was okay to vote for release. hadEnuf Nov 18 #10

They'll try it and maybe get away with it for a while. But there are ways to read through redactions. ancianita Nov 18 #21

Sadly, my thoughts too hibbing Nov 18 #45

They have the most to lose, and with women were the biggest voting demographic on Nov 4. ancianita Nov 18 #55

The fact that Trump and the GOP have fought this release hadEnuf Nov 18 #56

I don't think this is going to matter much. My comment from another thread: InstantGratification Nov 18 #27

I believe you. ancianita Nov 18 #42

The pedophile party really had no choice. It was going to be passed by the Democrats and self preservation LiberalArkie Nov 18 #15

Not one Republican can go back to their states & get re-elected after voting no. That's why they know they had no choice ancianita Nov 18 #22

Eggxactly LiberalArkie Nov 18 #24

It's got to get pass the Senate & Trump NotHardly Nov 18 #28

Never happen as long as Dump is in office HighFired49 Nov 18 #49

Hell popsdenver Nov 18 #54

The Guardians Of Pedophiles can't install anyone other than the 2nd in line. Justice matters. Nov 18 #61

Probably...... popsdenver Nov 18 #63

Now on to the new excuses Fullduplexxx Nov 18 #3

The 1? Clay Higgins, of course. Bo Zarts Nov 18 #4

He said he voted no because he is worried about the "innocent people" named in the files. SunSeeker Nov 18 #11

What about the innocent girls who were harmed? TexasBushwhacker Nov 18 #60

He doesn't give a shit about them. nt SunSeeker Nov 18 #62

His reasoning included a reference to "a rabid media" --: DeeDeeNY Nov 18 #13

Either on the list durablend Nov 18 #18

If you read his Wikipedia you will vanlassie Nov 18 #38

Make no mistake, almost all of the Republicans (the 4 who signed the discharge petition excepted) Wiz Imp Nov 18 #6

Agree but Trump did tell them to vote for it... also Johnson is trying to create a provision to exempt perpetrators... chowder66 Nov 18 #8

ABOUT TIME ! republianmushroom Nov 18 #7

Wow! This tide has turned FakeNoose Nov 18 #9

Brave warriors who have survived some of the most horrific crimes . LEMAUS Nov 18 #16

Please quakerboy Nov 18 #20

The Repukes who voted "yes" are under the impression that the Senate vote will be "no" FakeNoose Nov 18 #46

Were they? quakerboy Wednesday #68

Nice! Photos are good optics that stick in voters' memories. ancianita Nov 18 #25

Ahhh, but he will do something. That is what this BS investigation into Clinton et al is about. Bev54 Nov 18 #26

Sorry, you first HighFired49 Nov 18 #51

Not a problem all voices deserve to be heard. Bev54 Nov 18 #57

There is a petition on Change.org Linda ladeewolf Nov 18 #34

Finally some good news. LEMAUS Nov 18 #12

They have been samplegirl Nov 18 #14

who are the 5 that did not vote? nt orleans Nov 18 #17

All Republicans. Just can't find their names yet, nor will, most likely for suspicious reasons. ancianita Nov 18 #29

Here is the Roll Call vote - Not Voting were 3 (D)s and 2 (R)s BumRushDaShow Nov 18 #41

Thank you! Now we can ask them why. ancianita Nov 18 #44

Well Mikie Sherrill is now governor-elect of NJ BumRushDaShow Nov 18 #50

Ah, thanks, I didn't catch that, being used to two of a number of names... ancianita Nov 18 #52

3 dems, 2 Rs orleans Wednesday #64

right ancianita Wednesday #66

Just found this article BumRushDaShow Wednesday #67

When will anything new actually be released? Will Trump block all the way to the Supreme court? ChicagoTeamster Nov 18 #19

Louisiana Republican Clay Higgins voted against the bill. Two Republicans and three Democrats did not vote. IronLionZion Nov 18 #23

That's the question about those who abstained. Right? When their names are known they'll have some 'splainin' to do. ancianita Nov 18 #31

No but he appears on Fox News regularly. Initech Nov 18 #32

That 1 no vote is sticking out like a sore thumb! Initech Nov 18 #30

He's probably in the files. nt iemanja Nov 18 #36

He's probably in a safe district FakeNoose Nov 18 #48

100% he did this to get airtime on Fox and Newsmax and boost his profile. Initech Nov 18 #58

Up next: the Senate does everything in its power to prevent this from coming up for a vote Warpy Nov 18 #33

Don't get too excited iemanja Nov 18 #35

Full stop UT_democrat Nov 18 #37

This is not normal. awesomerwb1 Nov 18 #39

Now that their Fearful Leader has allowed it, the maggots come out of the woodwork to vote for it. Wonder Why Nov 18 #40

What menace does orange have up his sleeve? Clouds Passing Nov 18 #43

Epstein's brother is claiming that they are "scrubbing the files." Certainly months to do so. Evolve Dammit Nov 18 #47

Excuse me, Clay Higgins C_U_L8R Nov 18 #53

Too lopsided. Something's fishy SpankMe Nov 18 #59

I'm not getting my hopes up. Aussie105 Wednesday #65