Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

(29,876 posts)

2. The caption editor should have written it properly and said "highly likely" and how you find the

Mon May 6, 2013, 07:40 PM

May 2013

WH has no definitive 'position' on this, I can't figure.

Here is the WH/Carney clip:

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Syria's Assad Likely Behind Chemical Weapons Use, White House Says [View all] Purveyor May 2013 OP

"No definitive determination on chemical weapons use" WHEN CRABS ROAR May 2013 #3

"He's Got 'Em, Let's Get Him!" (Sarcasm with PHOTO) grahamhgreen May 2013 #5

"Highly likely" isn't evidence daleo May 2013 #6

But the US does not base this on any empirical evidence. David__77 May 2013 #8

The President does not John2 May 2013 #11