Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mainer

(12,390 posts)
33. "Time" Journalist names two websites you CAN'T trust about this case
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 02:56 PM
Feb 2014

Journalist Nina Burleigh talks about who's behind them:

Website: "Perugia Murder File", operated by a Seattle housewife.

and

Website: "True Justice for Meredith Kercher", operated by Peter Quennell, a New jersey-based Englishman who has posted outright fabrications, and has threatened Burleigh's children.

If anyone defends their position by linking to these sites, you can't trust the information.


If you have taken a dive down into the Amanda Knox rabbit hole, you will discover a couple of persistent acronyms. The first is PMF. That would be the Perugia Murder File, operated by a Seattle housewife and former French translator who is dedicated to the guilt of Amanda Knox. The other acronym you will encounter is TJMK, which stands for “True Justice For Meredith Kercher”—the young British woman murdered in this case–and is run by a New Jersey-based Englishman who claims that at one time he consulted at the United Nations.


These sites host extremely active avatars, many proclaiming to be lawyers, forensic experts, criminologists, but who never reveal their true identities. Researching my 2011 book on the Knox case The Fatal Gift of Beauty, I met both moderators behind the acronymic websites. In 2009, I sat down with TJMK founder Peter Quennell, who has always claimed he started the site to make sure that no one forgot the victim. A stout, ruddy Englishman living in New Jersey, he had been holding out the carrot of introducing me to the elusive Kercher family. He seemed vastly knowledgeable and connected. At the time, I also believed that Amanda Knox could be, indeed, a Charles Manson behind a pretty face.

After a month in Italy doing reporting, however, I realized that some of the “facts” on Quennell’s website didn’t seem to be in the police record in Italy. I emailed him to ask where he had found out that Knox and Sollecito met police standing outside the murder house with a mop and bucket in hand. That damning incident was nowhere in the record, not even the prosecutor would confirm it, nor had Italy’s Polizia Scientifica ever tested such items, which would surely have offered up some useful DNA evidence, had they been used to clean blood.

Quennell then accused me by email of being on the Knox family payroll, informed me that his sources in Perugia had seen me consorting with Amanda’s mother (I had in fact met with her once, in a public place, by then) and eventually started writing about how he was going to “train his scope” on my apartment in Manhattan, and closing emails with “how are the kiddies?”



Read more: The Amanda Knox Haters Society: How They Learned to Hate Me Too | TIME.com http://world.time.com/2013/03/29/the-amanda-knox-haters-society-how-they-learned-to-hate-me-too/#ixzz2s67KsOmP

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why would it take 3 months to come up with the explanation of the verdict? lostincalifornia Feb 2014 #1
How is it that Tom DeLay has never spent a day in jail? Lasher Feb 2014 #5
I will never go to that Pest Hole warrant46 Feb 2014 #44
Been there a couple of times... reACTIONary Feb 2014 #45
I think you'll find dipsydoodle Feb 2014 #6
I think you will find that the vast majority of DU people have no clue about Italian legal Fred Sanders Feb 2014 #14
That is why I am asking lostincalifornia Feb 2014 #18
It's almost like you have a vested interest in this case snooper2 Feb 2014 #52
Legal judgments are often reserved for periods of time. For the judges to explain in detail the Fred Sanders Feb 2014 #12
I did not criticize, I asked a simple question. You answered it lostincalifornia Feb 2014 #19
Thanks for the explination, and... reACTIONary Feb 2014 #46
Takes months for our SCOTUS to release their decisions lobodons Feb 2014 #26
It's not just the time to write opinions & dissents, but also the process of reaching a decision in 24601 Feb 2014 #30
Roberts switch lobodons Feb 2014 #41
They need time to hire a creative writer to come up with one Liberalynn Feb 2014 #47
That didn't explain anything. nt bemildred Feb 2014 #2
The jury came up with a motive? Captain Stern Feb 2014 #3
Which dosen't change the fact dipsydoodle Feb 2014 #7
I really have no confidence in the Italian justice system Gothmog Feb 2014 #54
" He told Corriere: "If Amanda had gone to work, probably we wouldn't be here." HERVEPA Feb 2014 #4
Why would they need a new motive? JoeyT Feb 2014 #8
LOL. sked14 Feb 2014 #11
Why can't it be explained now? blackspade Feb 2014 #9
Italian law mandates that the detailed verdict must be delivered in 90 days, on the appeal side. Fred Sanders Feb 2014 #13
That doesn't answer my question. blackspade Feb 2014 #15
Both the defendant and the prosecutor can appeal against the judgement before the Corte d'Appello Fred Sanders Feb 2014 #16
Thanks for the info. blackspade Feb 2014 #25
Standard operating procedure under Italian criminal appeals law Fred Sanders Feb 2014 #32
Why does it take 90 days? blackspade Feb 2014 #35
I understand it is to allow for an appeal period.....apples and oranges legal systems. Fred Sanders Feb 2014 #36
I'm not comparing ours to theirs. blackspade Feb 2014 #38
Fred, you work too hard to educate people who have forgotten what education is... Demenace Feb 2014 #20
Seriously? blackspade Feb 2014 #27
Absolutely! And our country, our rules! Adrahil Feb 2014 #24
If it's a politically biased system... reACTIONary Feb 2014 #48
If it was that difficult billh58 Feb 2014 #10
A better headline for this article: Downtown Hound Feb 2014 #17
+1000 blackspade Feb 2014 #29
"The Monster of Florence" by Douglas Preston and Mario Spezi olegramps Feb 2014 #21
looks like Preston has a new book... dhill926 Feb 2014 #23
"Monster of Florence" author talks about Knox case mainer Feb 2014 #22
Thanks for additional information. olegramps Feb 2014 #28
They were overcharged for meals and drinks ... reACTIONary Feb 2014 #49
Fortunately there were no murders at the time. So they got a free ride on that one. olegramps Feb 2014 #53
Criminal defense attorney calls verdict "an outrage" mainer Feb 2014 #31
"Time" Journalist names two websites you CAN'T trust about this case mainer Feb 2014 #33
Thank you, mainer. One of the people in this very thread has repeatedly posted pnwmom Feb 2014 #39
"truejustice.org" web guy stalks young women mainer Feb 2014 #34
Thank you for posting this. Yes, this persecutor of Amanda's is a sicko. And he's influenced pnwmom Feb 2014 #37
I don't know why I got drawn into this! mainer Feb 2014 #40
Thanks! I got drawn into this after she was convicted. I'd been assuming she was guilty all along, pnwmom Feb 2014 #42
Whether she is actually guilty or innocent- bossy22 Feb 2014 #43
I'm not very familiar with Italian justice system, but.... reACTIONary Feb 2014 #50
The American justice system is perfect! Democat Feb 2014 #51
The judge in this case is facing some problems Gothmog Feb 2014 #55
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Knox's judge explains gui...»Reply #33