Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Pentagon Plans to Shrink Army to Pre-World War II Level [View all]chrisa
(4,524 posts)23. Spending more and size =/= a better army
Sometimes size can be draining on an army. Also, throwing money where it isn't needed is wasteful and hurts us overall.
We need to return to the "snipers harassing the British" army that we were. That's metaphorical, but what I mean is, lean and mean > big and slow. We can still pick pirates off and perform rescues without having a gigantic invasion force. Large land wars are becoming passé.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

How about Constitutional levels? The Founding Fathers considered a standing army to be
tblue37
Feb 2014
#18
Exactly! The profiteers in America have enjoyed destroying countries and then rebuilding them. It's
RKP5637
Feb 2014
#27
They can start by demilitarizing the local police departments. Some of the police
RKP5637
Feb 2014
#30