Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Baltics Want NATO ‘Safeguard’ if Ukraine Situation Worsens [View all]Berlin Expat
(958 posts)12. Good question as to
whether it was a strategic decision or just one of those uncanny coincidences, but yes, it's good to have it as a bargaining chip with the Russians now, especially given their new and far more aggressive expansionist policy.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Ukraine had already worked out a non-member cooperation with NATO. They were doing training
okaawhatever
Mar 2014
#22
I think he held back on a missile defense phase, and now it's a new bargaining chip--
TwilightGardener
Mar 2014
#8
There were several things happening during the next year or two that would have put NATO and
okaawhatever
Mar 2014
#23
Yes, that's the case. Russia allowed it for a while because they're enemies with Afghanistan and the
okaawhatever
Mar 2014
#24
Because if the Ukraine dissolves into civil war then Europe gets to pick up the bits
fedsron2us
Mar 2014
#16
Depending on the source, news coverage and analysis are often pretty much the same.
rdharma
Mar 2014
#18
I visited Lithuania in 1995, and was able to talk to quite a few Lithuanians.
amandabeech
Mar 2014
#13
But you've recommended articles from Russia Today. Do you think Russia Today is a legitimate
okaawhatever
Mar 2014
#28
Yes, actually I was confused for a minute. I was thinking of WaPo. But why do you trust Russia Today
okaawhatever
Mar 2014
#42
so you know more than missile defense experts? You're the ultimate voice in whether the
okaawhatever
Mar 2014
#30
that wasn't the point you made. You called it a "joke" and a "scam". What makes it a joke, or
okaawhatever
Mar 2014
#36
That's what the first three phases were for. It was the fourth phase that was questionable due to
okaawhatever
Mar 2014
#41
A civil war shouldn't be a likely outcome. Ethnic Russians only make up 17% of the population. It
okaawhatever
Mar 2014
#37
Merkel is the one who would be least likely to make that statement. Remember, Germany sided with
okaawhatever
Mar 2014
#31
I found the story in the Guardian, but frankly, I'm so upset that I can't seem
amandabeech
Mar 2014
#34