Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Baltics Want NATO ‘Safeguard’ if Ukraine Situation Worsens [View all]rdharma
(6,057 posts)18. Depending on the source, news coverage and analysis are often pretty much the same.
Just depends on what "facts" you want to emphasize or omit .....and what slant you want to take when reporting the "news".
But, I'm sure you know how that works.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Ukraine had already worked out a non-member cooperation with NATO. They were doing training
okaawhatever
Mar 2014
#22
I think he held back on a missile defense phase, and now it's a new bargaining chip--
TwilightGardener
Mar 2014
#8
There were several things happening during the next year or two that would have put NATO and
okaawhatever
Mar 2014
#23
Yes, that's the case. Russia allowed it for a while because they're enemies with Afghanistan and the
okaawhatever
Mar 2014
#24
Because if the Ukraine dissolves into civil war then Europe gets to pick up the bits
fedsron2us
Mar 2014
#16
Depending on the source, news coverage and analysis are often pretty much the same.
rdharma
Mar 2014
#18
I visited Lithuania in 1995, and was able to talk to quite a few Lithuanians.
amandabeech
Mar 2014
#13
But you've recommended articles from Russia Today. Do you think Russia Today is a legitimate
okaawhatever
Mar 2014
#28
Yes, actually I was confused for a minute. I was thinking of WaPo. But why do you trust Russia Today
okaawhatever
Mar 2014
#42
so you know more than missile defense experts? You're the ultimate voice in whether the
okaawhatever
Mar 2014
#30
that wasn't the point you made. You called it a "joke" and a "scam". What makes it a joke, or
okaawhatever
Mar 2014
#36
That's what the first three phases were for. It was the fourth phase that was questionable due to
okaawhatever
Mar 2014
#41
A civil war shouldn't be a likely outcome. Ethnic Russians only make up 17% of the population. It
okaawhatever
Mar 2014
#37
Merkel is the one who would be least likely to make that statement. Remember, Germany sided with
okaawhatever
Mar 2014
#31
I found the story in the Guardian, but frankly, I'm so upset that I can't seem
amandabeech
Mar 2014
#34