Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
2. It might be a really good decision or a really, really bad one. Time will tell for
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 10:24 PM
Oct 2014

Last edited Sat Oct 4, 2014, 01:10 PM - Edit history (1)

certain.

That is good. It seems the same precautions should be applied to everyone since you don't uppityperson Oct 2014 #1
It might be a really good decision or a really, really bad one. Time will tell for Purveyor Oct 2014 #2
I think it is a big mistake. It may not be necessary to quarantine those countries in which ebola JDPriestly Oct 2014 #35
Ebola has been diagnosed in the USA, so I guess you mean us too since you say those countries inw uppityperson Oct 2014 #38
I would quarantine people who possibly could have had contact with someone who has the JDPriestly Oct 2014 #39
Somebody got through that screening system by lying rocktivity Oct 2014 #3
Apparently he got the visa and booked the ticket before he was infected. longship Oct 2014 #5
Apparently, he decided to put an escape plan in place rocktivity Oct 2014 #6
Well, before the person in his household became sick. longship Oct 2014 #9
I thought I read it takes 21 days from exposure to the first symptoms of the illness. JDPriestly Oct 2014 #36
If he actually knew he had Ebola, hedgehog Oct 2014 #42
He lied on the questionnaire. 840high Oct 2014 #10
If this really is his questionnaire rocktivity Oct 2014 #15
the questionnaire is given at the airport as well as temperature taking TorchTheWitch Oct 2014 #21
Adults who listen to scientists and science and not the voices on the TV are in charge. Fred Sanders Oct 2014 #4
In which country? Igel Oct 2014 #26
You are not infectious until you are symptomatic, so......get with the facts, they are your friend. Fred Sanders Oct 2014 #28
In the past, we in the US placed quarantines on children who had diseases like scarlet fever. JDPriestly Oct 2014 #37
I will have to go with the opinion of the epidemiologists, I prefer science over deeply held beliefs Fred Sanders Oct 2014 #43
Epidemiologists probably don't use as many railroad station restrooms as I do. JDPriestly Oct 2014 #47
who benefits from Ebola? quadrature Oct 2014 #7
I'm not comfortable with this decision Man from Pickens Oct 2014 #8
I'm not one bit happy with this decision. 840high Oct 2014 #12
Better over react than under react on this one. Cayenne Oct 2014 #14
Agreed customerserviceguy Oct 2014 #29
I think you've got it. candelista Oct 2014 #41
Good metaphor customerserviceguy Oct 2014 #44
the ultimate suicie mission elehhhhna Oct 2014 #51
Right Wing Has Been Saying Since August That Ebola Is A False Flag Op... TomCADem Oct 2014 #11
Well, they would know about false flag ops and taking away liberties... Demeter Oct 2014 #17
He damn well better reverse that decision and pronto. Cayenne Oct 2014 #13
Concur Demeter Oct 2014 #16
Most hospitals in my region are only allowing visitors over 16 to pediatric units eilen Oct 2014 #18
One question may be what a potential 'travel ban' would entail aceofblades Oct 2014 #19
Passports carry a record of entry and exit from countries AngryAmish Oct 2014 #24
Not doing anything is going to him though Dopers_Greed Oct 2014 #20
Mr. Duncan lied on his christx30 Oct 2014 #48
I didn't realize that his family here have come down with Ebola Marrah_G Oct 2014 #57
as we already learned it's not just people exhibiting symptoms TorchTheWitch Oct 2014 #22
DING DING DING! TorchTheWitch, you're our grand prize winner! rocktivity Oct 2014 #25
Excellent solution! I could never understand how nabbing infected people after they've Stardust Oct 2014 #31
and where would they be waiting those weeks? TorchTheWitch Oct 2014 #32
If they pass the first blood test, they can wait at home. rocktivity Oct 2014 #33
and if they get infected between the time of blood draw and TorchTheWitch Oct 2014 #34
Well, that's what the second blood test would be for rocktivity Oct 2014 #54
do we even know if the disease can be detected TorchTheWitch Oct 2014 #55
Right you are customerserviceguy Oct 2014 #30
I fear the virulent idiots in the media who are fanning this hysteria 6000eliot Oct 2014 #40
The screening isn't very effective Snow Leopard Oct 2014 #23
Good. At least someone has some common sense. FLPanhandle Oct 2014 #27
I am far from panicking crim son Oct 2014 #45
If "better safe than sorry" FLPanhandle Oct 2014 #49
How many times have we been wrong when attempting to predict the future? crim son Oct 2014 #46
I think Obama is making a big and serious mistake on this one. avaistheone1 Oct 2014 #50
PBO is not restricting entry because underthematrix Oct 2014 #52
Yet they had no problem stopping travel to Israel Iamthetruth Oct 2014 #53
It took a while, but I finally found the answer rocktivity Oct 2014 #56
Quick, cheap Ebola tests could be key to halting virus rocktivity Oct 2014 #58
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»White House Not Planning ...»Reply #2