Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
6. Well, I am FUCKING talking about the connection to people that some have.
Tue Apr 10, 2012, 12:14 AM
Apr 2012

If one knows the other person, knows something about them, maybe that they have family, or that they at least have spoken with you respectfully, it is MUCH harder to shoot them. And the situations which involve shooting become less frequent.

We spend millions in war demonizing our enemies, disrespecting them, their religion, their culture, de-personalizing them. Makes it much easier to put a round, or more, in them.

The police departments do that on a regular basis simply by the way they operate. They set themselves apart, treat blacks far more unjustly than whites, are often not involved in community activities (except where someone pays them to be security whether it is really needed or not), creating a culture where virtually EVERYONE outside the department is a potential shooter or other threat.

And then they complain that people act like they do when people disrepect them.




Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Law of unintended consequences.... peacebird Apr 2012 #1
That's what happens when criminals are released from prison too soon. nt Remmah2 Apr 2012 #21
Another facet to this is the militarization of police departments. jtuck004 Apr 2012 #2
You are correct (n/t) Tom Ripley Apr 2012 #3
it's harder to shoot someone when you know their name? Skittles Apr 2012 #4
Well, I am FUCKING talking about the connection to people that some have. jtuck004 Apr 2012 #6
please Skittles Apr 2012 #9
There's some evidence it's true. caseymoz Apr 2012 #14
Yes, yes yes duhneece Apr 2012 #20
Don't forget those who give the orders. caseymoz Apr 2012 #28
bunch of gobbledegook pasto76 Apr 2012 #7
CORRECT Skittles Apr 2012 #10
Must have learned to like sand, given that the above opinions sound like jtuck004 Apr 2012 #12
Baloney. Police respond to peaceful protests with chemicals weapons EFerrari Apr 2012 #13
Militarized BeGoodDoGood Apr 2012 #19
How do you picture a SWAT team? nt Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 #25
So unless they act EXACTLY like your unit in Iraq, they're not militarized? Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2012 #27
"Police officer" is just a label. ZombieHorde Apr 2012 #5
Maybe if the police don't go all George Zimmermann usrname Apr 2012 #8
Frankly, I would love to understand the circumstances behind each of these deaths MrScorpio Apr 2012 #11
As violent crime has decreased across the country? Really? fasttense Apr 2012 #15
Can you show how Bush changed crime stats? hack89 Apr 2012 #16
Yes BeGoodDoGood Apr 2012 #18
Simple leftynyc Apr 2012 #17
Looking back a little farther, that number doesn't show any obvious trend slackmaster Apr 2012 #22
Four Officers Wounded in Shootout Remmah2 Apr 2012 #23
It would be gross understatement to say that they're asking for it... saras Apr 2012 #24
"The War on Drugs has killed more police officers than anything else." - retired Chicago Cop ieoeja Apr 2012 #26
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Even as Violent Crime Fal...»Reply #6