Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

saras

(6,670 posts)
24. It would be gross understatement to say that they're asking for it...
Tue Apr 10, 2012, 11:30 AM
Apr 2012

The article also assumes, falsely, that everyone who kills a cop is trying to avoid a long sentence. In some cases, they're trying to avoid "killed while trying to escape" which would be virtually guaranteed if they gave themselves up. Or they're killing what appear to be insane thugs, who only turn out to be police afterwards. And this "insane thug" assumption is ALWAYS a reasonable assumption for a cop in riot gear, until they show otherwise.

I see FAR too many news articles on DU where the sensible response of a sensible society would be to either kill the cop like a mad dog to make them stop, or to instantly remove them from the public and keep them jailed until their trial, conviction, and sentencing (preferably under current guidelines rather than newer, more lenient ones).

And if the honest cops would support this, they could turn around police culture in America in a single generation.

Will they?

I know he's not a real cop, but face it, by both common sense AND by the laws of the state, Trayvon Williams had every right in the world to shoot George Zimmerman to death (and NOT vice versa). And we'd all be better off (possibly excepting the blacks who get killed or harassed in the white reprisals) if it had happened that way.

Of course, it would be EVEN BETTER if Zimmerman had never been allowed to prowl the streets alone, OR to own a weapon.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Law of unintended consequences.... peacebird Apr 2012 #1
That's what happens when criminals are released from prison too soon. nt Remmah2 Apr 2012 #21
Another facet to this is the militarization of police departments. jtuck004 Apr 2012 #2
You are correct (n/t) Tom Ripley Apr 2012 #3
it's harder to shoot someone when you know their name? Skittles Apr 2012 #4
Well, I am FUCKING talking about the connection to people that some have. jtuck004 Apr 2012 #6
please Skittles Apr 2012 #9
There's some evidence it's true. caseymoz Apr 2012 #14
Yes, yes yes duhneece Apr 2012 #20
Don't forget those who give the orders. caseymoz Apr 2012 #28
bunch of gobbledegook pasto76 Apr 2012 #7
CORRECT Skittles Apr 2012 #10
Must have learned to like sand, given that the above opinions sound like jtuck004 Apr 2012 #12
Baloney. Police respond to peaceful protests with chemicals weapons EFerrari Apr 2012 #13
Militarized BeGoodDoGood Apr 2012 #19
How do you picture a SWAT team? nt Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 #25
So unless they act EXACTLY like your unit in Iraq, they're not militarized? Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2012 #27
"Police officer" is just a label. ZombieHorde Apr 2012 #5
Maybe if the police don't go all George Zimmermann usrname Apr 2012 #8
Frankly, I would love to understand the circumstances behind each of these deaths MrScorpio Apr 2012 #11
As violent crime has decreased across the country? Really? fasttense Apr 2012 #15
Can you show how Bush changed crime stats? hack89 Apr 2012 #16
Yes BeGoodDoGood Apr 2012 #18
Simple leftynyc Apr 2012 #17
Looking back a little farther, that number doesn't show any obvious trend slackmaster Apr 2012 #22
Four Officers Wounded in Shootout Remmah2 Apr 2012 #23
It would be gross understatement to say that they're asking for it... saras Apr 2012 #24
"The War on Drugs has killed more police officers than anything else." - retired Chicago Cop ieoeja Apr 2012 #26
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Even as Violent Crime Fal...»Reply #24