Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

steve2470

(37,468 posts)

5. Ok I'm not understanding you

Reply to jberryhill (Reply #4)

Wed Apr 8, 2015, 07:21 PM

Apr 2015

Are you saying that before the 14th Amendment, this was a perfectly valid decision ? I admit to not being a constitutional lawyer (or any lawyer). It just seems "bad" to me that the Bill of Rights only apply to the federal government. That leaves an enormous hole for violations of civil rights. Obviously in this decision, the SCOTUS disagreed with me.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

1833 SCOTUS: Barron v. Baltimore 32 U.S. (7 Pet.) 243, Bill of Rights does not apply to state govts [View all] steve2470 Apr 2015 OP

This was prior to 14th Amendment Gothmog Apr 2015 #1

yes steve2470 Apr 2015 #3

Absent the 14th Amendment, it wasn't a "bad decision", though jberryhill Apr 2015 #4

Ok I'm not understanding you steve2470 Apr 2015 #5

That was one of the main points of the Civil War jberryhill Apr 2015 #6

Thanks for your civil and informative reply steve2470 Apr 2015 #7

The worst governments are run by dead people jberryhill Apr 2015 #8

That is why the legal theory of incorporation via the 14th amendment was adopted. Recently kelly1mm Apr 2015 #2