Editorials & Other Articles
In reply to the discussion: We didn’t need to drop the bomb — and even our WW II military icons knew it [View all]Martin Eden
(14,640 posts)I'm speculating here, but demonstrating to the world we had a weapon orders of magnitude greater than anything in human experience would have profound geostrategic implications. Wiping out cities and inflicting horrific human carnage has a greater effect than a test in a remote uninhabited area.
I will further speculate that the horrific devastation in Hiroshima and Nagasaki may have raised the threshold for ever using these weapons again and that this may have precluded a first use under different circumstances, perhaps a different world power. The Soviets tested their first atomic bomb just 4 years later, and for half a century we were bitterly hostile rivals in the Cold War. Mutually Assured Destruction forestalled direct large scale combat between us and them.
I am not justifying the use of atomic bombs against the Japanese people at the end of WWII. It is, perhaps, among the greatest war crimes of all time.
I am speculating as to what the ulterior motives (other than ending the war with fewer US casualties) may have been, and what the future might have been like otherwise.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):