Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Editorials & Other Articles
In reply to the discussion: We didn’t need to drop the bomb — and even our WW II military icons knew it [View all]TomVilmer
(1,921 posts)57. Hiroshima was just one more city totally annihilated...
Any explanation of the actions of Japans leaders that relies on the shock of the bombing of Hiroshima has to account for the fact that they considered a meeting to discuss the bombing on August 8, made a judgment that it was too unimportant ...
From our perspective, Hiroshima seems singular, extraordinary. But if you put yourself in the shoes of Japans leaders in the three weeks leading up to the attack on Hiroshima, the picture is considerably different. ... In the three weeks prior to Hiroshima, 26 cities were attacked by the U.S. Army Air Force. Of these, eight or almost a third were as completely or more completely destroyed than Hiroshima. ... The fact that Japan had 68 cities destroyed in the summer of 1945 poses a serious challenge for people who want to make the bombing of Hiroshima the cause of Japans surrender. ...
The story we have been telling ourselves seems pretty far removed from the facts. What are we to think about nuclear weapons if this enormous first accomplishment the miracle of Japans sudden surrender turns out to be a myth?
From our perspective, Hiroshima seems singular, extraordinary. But if you put yourself in the shoes of Japans leaders in the three weeks leading up to the attack on Hiroshima, the picture is considerably different. ... In the three weeks prior to Hiroshima, 26 cities were attacked by the U.S. Army Air Force. Of these, eight or almost a third were as completely or more completely destroyed than Hiroshima. ... The fact that Japan had 68 cities destroyed in the summer of 1945 poses a serious challenge for people who want to make the bombing of Hiroshima the cause of Japans surrender. ...
The story we have been telling ourselves seems pretty far removed from the facts. What are we to think about nuclear weapons if this enormous first accomplishment the miracle of Japans sudden surrender turns out to be a myth?
Quote is by Ward Wilson, a senior fellow at the British American Security Information Council, and the author of the book Five Myths About Nuclear Weapons.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
98 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

We didn’t need to drop the bomb — and even our WW II military icons knew it [View all]
polly7
May 2016
OP
I agree. I think we could have dropped it on some deserted Island and said you are next, and gotten
Hoyt
May 2016
#1
Don't forget that Japan was still fighting, and people dying every day.
AtheistCrusader
May 2016
#50
The Tokyo raid killed far more people than either atomic warhead. Short and long term.
AtheistCrusader
May 2016
#53
But, but millions of American lives were saved by avoiding a ground invasion!
RufusTFirefly
May 2016
#3
I was taught this in middle school (1975). I'm surprised it's a revelation and not common knowledge!
TheBlackAdder
May 2016
#6
I've always been heartbroken over this and never for one second believed it was necessary.
polly7
May 2016
#8
The Japanese had shown no propensity for surrender in WWII prior to the bomb; why assume they would?
MadDAsHell
May 2016
#10
I know it sounds great to say you are/were against the A-bomb drops but...
bernie_is_truth
May 2016
#12
I disagree. Period. And, I get tired of being insulted for thinking differently. nt.
polly7
May 2016
#23
I love the lie that the only time it's ever OK to use a nuke was the two times we happened to do it.
arcane1
May 2016
#30
If US decision-makers believed The Bomb was not necessary, then they had a different motive
Martin Eden
May 2016
#56
People are missing the point: Should Obama on behalf of the U.S. apologize for using the bomb twice?
YOHABLO
May 2016
#80