Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Editorials & Other Articles
In reply to the discussion: We didn’t need to drop the bomb — and even our WW II military icons knew it [View all]JohnnyRingo
(20,065 posts)67. I used to believe that
But the big question is why did they drop two different bombs? Certainly the blast at Hiroshima, with the threat of four more planned bombings through the summer would have sufficed in making the point, but the effects of uranium vs plutonium on a mass human population was unknown.
I'm not one for conspiracy theories, but the two different bombings would be a convenient study. Thank goodness we didn't test the hydrogen bomb on human targets. At least not directly.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
98 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

We didn’t need to drop the bomb — and even our WW II military icons knew it [View all]
polly7
May 2016
OP
I agree. I think we could have dropped it on some deserted Island and said you are next, and gotten
Hoyt
May 2016
#1
Don't forget that Japan was still fighting, and people dying every day.
AtheistCrusader
May 2016
#50
The Tokyo raid killed far more people than either atomic warhead. Short and long term.
AtheistCrusader
May 2016
#53
But, but millions of American lives were saved by avoiding a ground invasion!
RufusTFirefly
May 2016
#3
I was taught this in middle school (1975). I'm surprised it's a revelation and not common knowledge!
TheBlackAdder
May 2016
#6
I've always been heartbroken over this and never for one second believed it was necessary.
polly7
May 2016
#8
The Japanese had shown no propensity for surrender in WWII prior to the bomb; why assume they would?
MadDAsHell
May 2016
#10
I know it sounds great to say you are/were against the A-bomb drops but...
bernie_is_truth
May 2016
#12
I disagree. Period. And, I get tired of being insulted for thinking differently. nt.
polly7
May 2016
#23
I love the lie that the only time it's ever OK to use a nuke was the two times we happened to do it.
arcane1
May 2016
#30
If US decision-makers believed The Bomb was not necessary, then they had a different motive
Martin Eden
May 2016
#56
People are missing the point: Should Obama on behalf of the U.S. apologize for using the bomb twice?
YOHABLO
May 2016
#80