Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MosheFeingold

(3,051 posts)
4. Dangerous Argument
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 07:01 PM
Jun 2016

The arms in private hands during the Revolution (particularly certain domestic long rifles used to great effect sniping British officers) were often superior to the shorter range Brown Bess musket most commonly used by the British (although the Brits did have a small number of rifles, including a breach loading model).

There are a number of court cases that hold that the arms contemplated by the Second Amendment were, in fact, whatever would be the contemporary to whatever the military had access to, being that the purpose was to have an armed populous to serve as the militia (and also to keep the government itself in check). In fact, a number of liberal USSC justices danced around that argument.

Anyway, long way of saying this argument can be used against reasonable gun control and would not be my recommended approach.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»What “arms” looked like w...»Reply #4