The military-takeout complex: An interview with Conflict Kitchen

[Ken Burch]

http://rabble.ca/blogs/bloggers/christina-turner/2014/04/military-takeout-complex-interview-conflict-kitchen

The military-takeout complex: An interview with Conflict Kitchen
Conflict Kitchen is a restaurant in Pittsburgh that only serves food from countries the U.S. is in conflict with. Founded by artists Jon Rubin and Dawn Weleski in 2010, so far Conflict Kitchen has served up takeout dishes from Iran, Venezuela, Cuba, North Korea and now Afghanistan. I caught up with Jon Rubin by phone to talk about the restaurant that married food with politics.

Christina Turner: Where did the idea for Conflict Kitchen come from?

Jon Rubin: The project came about because of what we felt was absent from the landscape in Pittsburgh, specifically the lack of cultural and ethnic diversity within the city. Oftentimes, one of the ways in which communities and expats introduce themselves into an American city is by opening restaurants. We're a small city and the population of expats from Afghanistan or Venezuela or Cuba that are living in Pittsburgh is very small, so it's not likely that they're going to open restaurants. So what we thought is that we could open those restaurants and use them as an opportunity to not only bring that cuisine to the culture of the city, but also to start a very specific conversation about politics and conflict that is particular to U.S. relations worldwide.
We recognized that food was a very basic device that appeals to a broad range of people regardless of ideology, and that by functioning as a restaurant we were capable of engaging people who might not come, say, to an academic conference or a political rally or a cultural discussion group. Then we have the capacity once they arrive to present them with information that is more than the food itself. So that seems to be a really interesting bait and switch device that we're capable of employing. The core mission of our project is to have a space in our city that's open for political discussions and catalyzes curiosity about countries and people who live very far away.

CT: Why conflict, though? If your goal is cultural diversity, then why enlist conflict as a criterion for your restaurant?

JR: We start from a crisis point. Some conflicts are more obvious than others. In Afghanistan, for instance, we obviously still have military troops. A crisis point is any point in which we're sending over troops or we're engaged in covert, or even overt, actions within a country. It's a symptom of something that has gone wrong between the United States and that country. It's looking at this symptom as a starting point, but what happens is that's usually the end point for most discussions that you might see in the media.
We're interested in asking: what's the culture that lies beneath this crisis? What are the dynamics that we might not be aware of, whether it's how people are living in Afghanistan and what the impact of our presence there has created in the minds of Afghans, or what Afghans say here in the United States think about the U.S. involvement there. And what is the historical and contemporary culture that we might be engaged with? When we [the U.S.] go and take actions abroad the ramifications of those actions play out against the context of the culture of that country before we even arrive. Oftentimes, I think folks in the US don't know that context so they see our actions in isolation. Sometimes you frankly don't know the cuisines from that part of the world. How does that start a story of place that is not just based on an American perspective?

(more at the link.)


An interesting concept, I think.