Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pinqy

(596 posts)
3. Two errors right off the bat
Thu Apr 25, 2013, 08:28 AM
Apr 2013

First he says "The idea is that when prices go up, most people substitute lower cost items."
That is inaccurate. The idea is that when prices change, people tend to substitute to similar items that don't change as much. It's the relative change, not the relative cost, that's the factor. And it's not really an idea, it's a fact. People change their spending patterns based on relative price changes. And it works both ways. At $11/lb, I don't normally buy crab meat. But when it's on sale for $9/lb, I will, and buy less beef or pork or chicken. That's a substitution and is captured in the chained CPI.

Next he says "This makes no sense for seniors because they spend 20-40% of their incomes on health care and they can't substitute lower cost alternatives." That's not an issue with the chained CPI because it measures actual substititutions. If they're not making any, then it won't be reflected in the chained CPI. And he's forgetting about generic versus brand name in prescription medication. That's a substitution people make.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Robert Reich: Everything ...»Reply #3