Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
In reply to the discussion: Trump's use of hypnotic language [View all]Major Nikon
(36,924 posts)63. You are completely misunderstanding the term
Placebo's often have efficacy over doing nothing at all. Whether or not a drug or treatment is considered efficacious is the response compared to that of the placebo.
The Active drug group (A): who receive the active test drug.
The Placebo drug group (P): who receive a placebo drug that simulates the active drug.
The Natural history group (NH): who receive no treatment of any kind (and whose condition, therefore, is allowed to run its natural course).
The outcomes within each group are observed, and compared with each other, allowing us to measure:
The efficacy of the active drug's treatment: the difference between A and NH (i.e., A-NH).
The efficacy of the active drug's active ingredient: the difference between A and P (i.e., A-P).
The magnitude of the placebo response: the difference between P and NH (i.e., P-NH).
It is a matter of interpretation whether the value of P-NH indicates the efficacy of the entire treatment process or the magnitude of the "placebo response". The results of these comparisons then determine whether or not a particular drug is considered efficacious.
The Placebo drug group (P): who receive a placebo drug that simulates the active drug.
The Natural history group (NH): who receive no treatment of any kind (and whose condition, therefore, is allowed to run its natural course).
The outcomes within each group are observed, and compared with each other, allowing us to measure:
The efficacy of the active drug's treatment: the difference between A and NH (i.e., A-NH).
The efficacy of the active drug's active ingredient: the difference between A and P (i.e., A-P).
The magnitude of the placebo response: the difference between P and NH (i.e., P-NH).
It is a matter of interpretation whether the value of P-NH indicates the efficacy of the entire treatment process or the magnitude of the "placebo response". The results of these comparisons then determine whether or not a particular drug is considered efficacious.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Placebo-controlled_study
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
76 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

She has about 93% of the super d's who have comiitrd and Bernie has about 7% of them
CentralMass
May 2016
#76
There's no evidence of the efficacy of hypnosis even on fully willing subjects
Major Nikon
May 2016
#2
Trump is not using hypnosis. He's using hypnotic techniques. Both work but big difference.
Bernardo de La Paz
May 2016
#7
Don't over emphasize "hypnotic". Trump is using clever and effective persuasive techniques to attack
TryLogic
May 2016
#25
He is appealing to the 'conservatives' fear, anger, bigotry and loss of control
ToxMarz
May 2016
#32
Nope. He does entrance them, plants nicknames & reinforces their lack of critical thinking
Bernardo de La Paz
May 2016
#44
Do some research before you dismiss the idea of active trance-like states. . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
May 2016
#46
Uh, people pray, die for the 1%, and smoke cigarettes. I'd say brainwashing is very effective. nt
valerief
May 2016
#53
This guy doesn't know what he's talking about.Trump is just a bafoon stirring up hate.
bjobotts
May 2016
#69
Adams says Trump's use of "coded" language hypnotically validates their need for "good old days"
ancianita
May 2016
#3
Adams doesn't support Trump but he predicted that Trump will win the Presidency because of his
Uncle Joe
May 2016
#6
Way cool. Thanks for this video. Hillary campaign speech writers should see this.
ancianita
May 2016
#17
LOL. Yes, that's right. Trump is a master "hypnotist" casting his spell upon us!!11!1!
PSPS
May 2016
#8
There are differences between hypnosis and placebos but placebos have power over the mind as well,
Uncle Joe
May 2016
#11
Bernie doesn't repeat the same exact phrase multiple times in the same speech. Furthermore
Uncle Joe
May 2016
#12
I totally agree with your post regarding the need to elect Bernie but ignoring or downplaying
Uncle Joe
May 2016
#30
1. The Democratic Primaries aren't over despite your fervent wishes to the contrary.
Uncle Joe
May 2016
#26
The subconscious is like the auto-pilot on an airplane, you can program it with instructions
Uncle Joe
May 2016
#37
Hypnotic perhaps if you're receptive. More like finger nails on a chalkboard to me. n/t
Lodestar
May 2016
#62