Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
In reply to the discussion: Who Repealed the Glass-Steagall Act? [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)34. Watch Bill Clinton, Larry Summers, and Phil Gramm Have a Love Fest Over Repeal of Glass Steagall
per Yves Smith, Naked Capitalism, April 28, 2016:
EXCERPT...
But even allowing for the fact that some and probably most of the gains were real, youll see Clinton try to sell a Big Lie: that productivity gains were tied to increased worker prosperity. As numerous commentators pointed out, that story had stopped being true as of roughly 1976. Businesses once did share the benefits of productivity gains with workers, but as labor bargaining power weakened, kept it for themselves. Clinton continues with his canards, praising open borders as keeping inflation low. The mechanism by which inflation is contained is by restricting wage growth. A prosperous, full employment economy will feature strong growth in pay levels, and will at some point lead to pricing pressure (mind you, profit levels in the US are now so far outside historical norms that businesses could go a long way in increasing wages if they werent so greedy). So his low inflation story is again at odds with his effort to depict everything as rosy for average workers.
SNIP...
The large point is the Clintons have been loyal followers of the Robert Rubin school of thinking, that bankers should run the economy, not just ours but everywhere. And he and his acolytes have been extremely successful in promoting finance-friendly policies around the world. And despite the wreckage of the global financial crisis, there has been little change in either the fealty to neoliberal ideology or the power of financiers. But both are seen as less and less legitimate by broader society, which is a key first step in reducing their influence.
But even allowing for the fact that some and probably most of the gains were real, youll see Clinton try to sell a Big Lie: that productivity gains were tied to increased worker prosperity. As numerous commentators pointed out, that story had stopped being true as of roughly 1976. Businesses once did share the benefits of productivity gains with workers, but as labor bargaining power weakened, kept it for themselves. Clinton continues with his canards, praising open borders as keeping inflation low. The mechanism by which inflation is contained is by restricting wage growth. A prosperous, full employment economy will feature strong growth in pay levels, and will at some point lead to pricing pressure (mind you, profit levels in the US are now so far outside historical norms that businesses could go a long way in increasing wages if they werent so greedy). So his low inflation story is again at odds with his effort to depict everything as rosy for average workers.
SNIP...
The large point is the Clintons have been loyal followers of the Robert Rubin school of thinking, that bankers should run the economy, not just ours but everywhere. And he and his acolytes have been extremely successful in promoting finance-friendly policies around the world. And despite the wreckage of the global financial crisis, there has been little change in either the fealty to neoliberal ideology or the power of financiers. But both are seen as less and less legitimate by broader society, which is a key first step in reducing their influence.
Funny how many "fathers and mothers" the repeal of Glass Steagall had before the crash it caused. Guess who paid the $24 trillion it cost?
Wars Without End. Millions tossed from homes. Gig Economy and McJobs Only.
It's not just American Democracy, it's a Planet Run By Banksters and Warmongers.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Either converse and say something, or think of questions that have a point...
MrMickeysMom
Jun 2016
#21
I, initially, was asking how, or why, President Bill Clinton's signing the repeal of G-S ...
1StrongBlackMan
Jun 2016
#40
Or, maybe, that she had anything to do with the repeal. There is that possibly. No?
1StrongBlackMan
Jun 2016
#43
Whether she did or did not, she's now on record as being against re-reinstating it as Bernie wants.
whathehell
Jun 2016
#51
Isn't Bill the one that Sen Clinton says will be in charge of the economy?
Winston.Smith
Jun 2016
#52
That is factually incorrect ... The shadow banks were unafected by G-S ...
1StrongBlackMan
Jun 2016
#24
That is the corporate talking points. They desperately wanted Bill Clinton to sign
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#25
I will respond, though it has been explained time, and time and time again ...
1StrongBlackMan
Jun 2016
#23
You are defending those that made an easy $12 trillion dollars that came from the middle
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#26
Why then was it so important to repeal it? Your rationalization comes directly from those that
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#37
Those 25 people are much wealthier today. The rest of us not so much. We really have become
floriduck
Jun 2016
#3
Sheldon Adelson the casino operator saw his fortune grow $2 billion in one day.
Octafish
Jun 2016
#32
Strange how it's OK for Banksters to loot trillions and toss millions from their homes...
Octafish
Jun 2016
#62
Watch Bill Clinton, Larry Summers, and Phil Gramm Have a Love Fest Over Repeal of Glass Steagall
Octafish
Jun 2016
#34
The result is far from an open and shut case of what caused the collapse and you know it.
The_Casual_Observer
Jun 2016
#57