Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

white_wolf

(6,257 posts)
6. From what I've read on the topic...
Mon May 14, 2012, 04:14 PM
May 2012

I've heard the Dali Lama actually praised some of reforms put in place by China, even if he opposed China's heavy handed way of doing it. He has also said he regrets taking CIA money. I don't know enough about the man to pass judgement, but we should remember that he was only 15 when China enter Tibet, he claims he wanted to make some reforms and he may have wanted to. I highly doubt the rulers of Tibet would have handed power over to a 15 year old boy regardless of whether he is the Dali Lama or not. Now, I'm going to say something that has gotten me in trouble with some Marxists before. China had no right to to be in Tibet, it was imperialism, no different than what the U.S. did to Iraq of Afghanistan and I don't think Tibet is any better off under China's rule. Tibet was a semi-feudal state before China invaded and I really don't know what made them think they could build socialism there. Hell, they couldn't even build it in China.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Socialist Progressives»Buddhism, Marxism and th...»Reply #6