Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Thursday, 2 July 2015 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)3. The economic plan that could save America (but scares conservative billionaires senseless)
http://www.salon.com/2015/06/29/the_economic_plan_that_could_save_america_but_scares_conservative_billionaires_senseless/
Guaranteed government jobs would be a huge boon to the American worker and deprive the rich of their power...Long-term unemployment is the scourge of modern economies. In a society where people take value from work, unemployment is destabilizing and degrading. A bout of long-term unemployment can permanently scar workers, leaving them with lower wages and fewer usable skills. Last year, Jared Bernstein and Dean Baker put forward a persuasive case for a return to full employment as the palliative to unemployment. But its increasingly clear the private sector cannot create full employment on its own. Even at the height of the Clinton boom, millions of African-Americans and low-skilled workers were jobless. To get full employment, progressives should embrace an idea that hasnt surfaced recently in mainstream American political dialogue: a universal government job guarantee.
In a recent article, Derek Thompson explored a future world without work. While his article was well-researched and informative, it misses a key point: For inner-city Black Americans, a world without work is not a dystopian future, but a present reality. As Mark Levine writes, By 2010, in five of the nations largest metropolitan areas, fewer than half of working-age black males held jobs. In 25 of the nations largest metropolitan areas, fewer than 55 percent of working-age black males were, in fact, employed. In a recent Center for Economic Policy Research report Cherrie Bucknor notes the Black/white gap in employment rates increased during the recent recession and is still larger than its pre-recession level. Reniqua Allen refers to this reality as the permanent recession that Black men face. People of color are the first to lose jobs during a recession and the last to gain them in a recovery. Further, many future losses from new technology will occur in heavily racialized sectors, like retail and fast food. Occupational segregation means that people of color, and particularly women of color, will bear the brunt of job losses. Racial justice requires addressing the future of work.
A government job guarantee has a long history in American politics. As Theda Skocpol notes in Social Policy in The United States, during the recession of the 1890s, the American Federation of Labor (which later merged with the Congress of Industrial Organizations to form AFL-CIO), requested public works to abate the recession. They repeated these demands during the early 1900s, and after World War I demanded that a nation that sent men into battle had a moral and political obligation to make sure they had jobs when they returned home.
However, the AFL were opposed to government-sponsored unemployment insurance. Skocpol cites Alex Keyssar who writes that, unionists stressed that public works programs were preferable to simple poor relief in three respects: They paid workers a living wage rather than a pittance; they permitted jobless men and women to avoid the demoralizing consequences of accepting charity; and they performed a useful public service. However, over the past decade, the government hasnt guaranteed jobs; instead ,conservative austerity policies have lead to millions of public sector jobs being cut.

MORE
Guaranteed government jobs would be a huge boon to the American worker and deprive the rich of their power...Long-term unemployment is the scourge of modern economies. In a society where people take value from work, unemployment is destabilizing and degrading. A bout of long-term unemployment can permanently scar workers, leaving them with lower wages and fewer usable skills. Last year, Jared Bernstein and Dean Baker put forward a persuasive case for a return to full employment as the palliative to unemployment. But its increasingly clear the private sector cannot create full employment on its own. Even at the height of the Clinton boom, millions of African-Americans and low-skilled workers were jobless. To get full employment, progressives should embrace an idea that hasnt surfaced recently in mainstream American political dialogue: a universal government job guarantee.
In a recent article, Derek Thompson explored a future world without work. While his article was well-researched and informative, it misses a key point: For inner-city Black Americans, a world without work is not a dystopian future, but a present reality. As Mark Levine writes, By 2010, in five of the nations largest metropolitan areas, fewer than half of working-age black males held jobs. In 25 of the nations largest metropolitan areas, fewer than 55 percent of working-age black males were, in fact, employed. In a recent Center for Economic Policy Research report Cherrie Bucknor notes the Black/white gap in employment rates increased during the recent recession and is still larger than its pre-recession level. Reniqua Allen refers to this reality as the permanent recession that Black men face. People of color are the first to lose jobs during a recession and the last to gain them in a recovery. Further, many future losses from new technology will occur in heavily racialized sectors, like retail and fast food. Occupational segregation means that people of color, and particularly women of color, will bear the brunt of job losses. Racial justice requires addressing the future of work.
A government job guarantee has a long history in American politics. As Theda Skocpol notes in Social Policy in The United States, during the recession of the 1890s, the American Federation of Labor (which later merged with the Congress of Industrial Organizations to form AFL-CIO), requested public works to abate the recession. They repeated these demands during the early 1900s, and after World War I demanded that a nation that sent men into battle had a moral and political obligation to make sure they had jobs when they returned home.
However, the AFL were opposed to government-sponsored unemployment insurance. Skocpol cites Alex Keyssar who writes that, unionists stressed that public works programs were preferable to simple poor relief in three respects: They paid workers a living wage rather than a pittance; they permitted jobless men and women to avoid the demoralizing consequences of accepting charity; and they performed a useful public service. However, over the past decade, the government hasnt guaranteed jobs; instead ,conservative austerity policies have lead to millions of public sector jobs being cut.

MORE
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
24 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

The economic plan that could save America (but scares conservative billionaires senseless)
Demeter
Jul 2015
#3
Chapter 4: Who guards the guardians? The conflicting interests of investment arbitrators
Demeter
Jul 2015
#4
JUNE 10 Here are all the CEOs and politicians going to the top secret Bilderberg Conference
Demeter
Jul 2015
#10
Pillage and Class Polarization: The Rise of “Criminal Capitalism” By James Petras
Demeter
Jul 2015
#11
ETA News Release: Unemployment Insurance Weekly Claims Report (07/02/2015)
mahatmakanejeeves
Jul 2015
#22