Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: Weekend Economists Salute Ruin July 3-5, 2015 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)21. Europe’s Many Economic Disasters PAUL KRUGMAN CHEERS US UP
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/03/opinion/paul-krugman-europes-many-disasters.html
Its depressing thinking about Greece these days, so lets talk about something else, O.K.? Lets talk, for starters, about Finland, which couldnt be more different from that corrupt, irresponsible country to the south. Finland is a model European citizen; it has honest government, sound finances and a solid credit rating, which lets it borrow money at incredibly low interest rates.
Its also in the eighth year of a slump that has cut real gross domestic product per capita by 10 percent and shows no sign of ending. In fact, if it werent for the nightmare in southern Europe, the troubles facing the Finnish economy might well be seen as an epic disaster. And Finland isnt alone. Its part of an arc of economic decline that extends across northern Europe through Denmark which isnt on the euro, but is managing its money as if it were to the Netherlands. All of these countries are, by the way, doing much worse than France, whose economy gets terrible press from journalists who hate its strong social safety net, but it has actually held up better than almost every other European nation except Germany.
And what about southern Europe outside Greece? European officials have been hyping the recovery in Spain, which did everything it was supposed to do and whose economy has finally started to grow again and even to create jobs. But success, European-style, means an unemployment rate that is still almost 23 percent and real income per capita that is still down 7 percent from its pre-crisis level. Portugal has also obediently implemented harsh austerity and is 6 percent poorer than it used to be.
Why are there so many economic disasters in Europe? Actually, whats striking at this point is how much the origin stories of European crises differ. Yes, the Greek government borrowed too much. But the Spanish government didnt Spains story is all about private lending and a housing bubble. And Finlands story doesnt involve debt at all. It is, instead, about weak demand for forest products, still a major national export, and the stumbles of Finnish manufacturing, in particular of its erstwhile national champion Nokia.
What all of these economies have in common, however, is that by joining the eurozone they put themselves into an economic straitjacket. Finland had a very severe economic crisis at the end of the 1980s much worse, at the beginning, than what its going through now. But it was able to engineer a fairly quick recovery in large part by sharply devaluing its currency, making its exports more competitive. This time, unfortunately, it had no currency to devalue. And the same goes for Europes other trouble spots.
Does this mean that creating the euro was a mistake? Well, yes. But thats not the same as saying that it should be eliminated now that it exists. The urgent thing now is to loosen that straitjacket. This would involve action on multiple fronts, from a unified system of bank guarantees to a willingness to offer debt relief for countries where debt is the problem. It would also involve creating a more favorable overall environment for countries trying to adjust to bad luck by renouncing excessive austerity and doing everything possible to raise Europes underlying inflation rate currently below 1 percent at least back up to the official target of 2 percent.
But there are many European officials and politicians who are opposed to anything and everything that might make the euro workable, who still believe that all would be well if everyone exhibited sufficient discipline. And thats why there is even more at stake in Sundays Greek referendum than most observers realize.
One of the great risks if the Greek public votes yes that is, votes to accept the demands of the creditors, and hence repudiates the Greek governments position and probably brings the government down is that it will empower and encourage the architects of European failure. The creditors will have demonstrated their strength, their ability to humiliate anyone who challenges demands for austerity without end. And they will continue to claim that imposing mass unemployment is the only responsible course of action.
What if Greece votes no? This will lead to scary, unknown terrain. Greece might well leave the euro, which would be hugely disruptive in the short run. But it will also offer Greece itself a chance for real recovery. And it will serve as a salutary shock to the complacency of Europes elites. Or to put it a bit differently, its reasonable to fear the consequences of a no vote, because nobody knows what would come next. But you should be even more afraid of the consequences of a yes, because in that case we do know what comes next more austerity, more disasters and eventually a crisis much worse than anything weve seen so far.
Its depressing thinking about Greece these days, so lets talk about something else, O.K.? Lets talk, for starters, about Finland, which couldnt be more different from that corrupt, irresponsible country to the south. Finland is a model European citizen; it has honest government, sound finances and a solid credit rating, which lets it borrow money at incredibly low interest rates.
Its also in the eighth year of a slump that has cut real gross domestic product per capita by 10 percent and shows no sign of ending. In fact, if it werent for the nightmare in southern Europe, the troubles facing the Finnish economy might well be seen as an epic disaster. And Finland isnt alone. Its part of an arc of economic decline that extends across northern Europe through Denmark which isnt on the euro, but is managing its money as if it were to the Netherlands. All of these countries are, by the way, doing much worse than France, whose economy gets terrible press from journalists who hate its strong social safety net, but it has actually held up better than almost every other European nation except Germany.
And what about southern Europe outside Greece? European officials have been hyping the recovery in Spain, which did everything it was supposed to do and whose economy has finally started to grow again and even to create jobs. But success, European-style, means an unemployment rate that is still almost 23 percent and real income per capita that is still down 7 percent from its pre-crisis level. Portugal has also obediently implemented harsh austerity and is 6 percent poorer than it used to be.
Why are there so many economic disasters in Europe? Actually, whats striking at this point is how much the origin stories of European crises differ. Yes, the Greek government borrowed too much. But the Spanish government didnt Spains story is all about private lending and a housing bubble. And Finlands story doesnt involve debt at all. It is, instead, about weak demand for forest products, still a major national export, and the stumbles of Finnish manufacturing, in particular of its erstwhile national champion Nokia.
What all of these economies have in common, however, is that by joining the eurozone they put themselves into an economic straitjacket. Finland had a very severe economic crisis at the end of the 1980s much worse, at the beginning, than what its going through now. But it was able to engineer a fairly quick recovery in large part by sharply devaluing its currency, making its exports more competitive. This time, unfortunately, it had no currency to devalue. And the same goes for Europes other trouble spots.
Does this mean that creating the euro was a mistake? Well, yes. But thats not the same as saying that it should be eliminated now that it exists. The urgent thing now is to loosen that straitjacket. This would involve action on multiple fronts, from a unified system of bank guarantees to a willingness to offer debt relief for countries where debt is the problem. It would also involve creating a more favorable overall environment for countries trying to adjust to bad luck by renouncing excessive austerity and doing everything possible to raise Europes underlying inflation rate currently below 1 percent at least back up to the official target of 2 percent.
But there are many European officials and politicians who are opposed to anything and everything that might make the euro workable, who still believe that all would be well if everyone exhibited sufficient discipline. And thats why there is even more at stake in Sundays Greek referendum than most observers realize.
One of the great risks if the Greek public votes yes that is, votes to accept the demands of the creditors, and hence repudiates the Greek governments position and probably brings the government down is that it will empower and encourage the architects of European failure. The creditors will have demonstrated their strength, their ability to humiliate anyone who challenges demands for austerity without end. And they will continue to claim that imposing mass unemployment is the only responsible course of action.
What if Greece votes no? This will lead to scary, unknown terrain. Greece might well leave the euro, which would be hugely disruptive in the short run. But it will also offer Greece itself a chance for real recovery. And it will serve as a salutary shock to the complacency of Europes elites. Or to put it a bit differently, its reasonable to fear the consequences of a no vote, because nobody knows what would come next. But you should be even more afraid of the consequences of a yes, because in that case we do know what comes next more austerity, more disasters and eventually a crisis much worse than anything weve seen so far.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
70 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Organizational capacity and the Greek Referendum by Lambert Strether Naked Capitalism
Demeter
Jul 2015
#6
Great OP, thread, all of it, what fitting way to celebrate the July 4th holiday, Greece, the
mother earth
Jul 2015
#48
Europe has suffered a reputational catastrophe in Greece: unable to manage its basic moral responsib
Demeter
Jul 2015
#7
Americans Not In The Labor Force Jumps By 640,000 To 93.6 Million (Participation Rate Drops To 1977
Demeter
Jul 2015
#18
Only 44 Percent Of U.S. Adults Are Employed For 30 Or More Hours Per Week FEBRUARY
Demeter
Jul 2015
#57
Big Trouble In Big China: Shanghai Stock Market Index Drops 5.77% In One Day (And 29% Since June 12)
Demeter
Jul 2015
#43
Anti-Americanism provides big boost to Russia's small IT businesses - CSMonitor.com
MattSh
Jul 2015
#32
Metadata Doesn't Always Mean Metadata: New Snowden Revelations Reveal Government Spying Went Much De
Demeter
Jul 2015
#39
What Do We Learn from the Latest Monthly Employment Report?: DeLong FAQ by Brad DeLong
Demeter
Jul 2015
#44
Bernie Sanders on the situation in Greece & the IMF...unprecedented stance.
mother earth
Jul 2015
#47
9 Myths Of Greek Crisis: Insider’s take on the conventional wisdom to ignore. By James K. Galbraith
Demeter
Jul 2015
#61
Stanford scholar debunks long-held beliefs about economic growth in ancient Greece
Demeter
Jul 2015
#63
Excellent article by an excellent economist! Kudos to Galbraith for laying it out for us,
mother earth
Jul 2015
#66
Greek voters angry at media & creditors, scare-mongering campaign seems to backfire
DemReadingDU
Jul 2015
#64
the trend is slowing, but still the lead widens. nearly 77% in; 61.60% OXI.
magical thyme
Jul 2015
#68