Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
3. Good post. The seriousness of the issue is downplayed by too many.
Sun Mar 25, 2012, 06:57 PM
Mar 2012

Atomic power is clean, green and too cheap to meter don'cha know?

People's Daily Online>>Opinion
Prevent nuclear terrorism
By Li Hong (China Daily)
08:30, March 23, 2012


The upcoming Nuclear Security Summit in Seoul on March 26-27 will further discuss global cooperation in preventing nuclear terrorism. Although no nuclear terrorist attack has been reported so far, nuclear and radioactive materials and related technologies are widely used and the possibility of a nuclear terrorist attack does exist.

According to the International Atomic Energy Agency, there have been a total of 2,164 incidents involving the loss, theft or unauthorized possession of nuclear and radioactive materials from 1993 to 2011, and the Fukuyama nuclear crisis in Japan has demonstrated that an attack on the diesel-driven emergency power supply system, fuel rods and other key parts of a nuclear power plant could trigger a nuclear disaster.

The international community has made great efforts to prevent nuclear terrorism. The United Nations Security Council adopted resolution 1540 in 2004 to prohibit any non-state actor acquiring or manufacturing weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear weapons. Resolution 1887 was adopted at a summit in 2009 on nuclear non-proliferation and nuclear disarmament aimed at strengthening the implementation of resolution 1540. It urged all countries to ensure the security of especially vulnerable nuclear weapons materials to prevent nuclear terrorism.

At the first Nuclear Security Summit in 2010, global leaders reached a consensus on the seriousness of the threat of nuclear terrorism and the necessity of working together to reduce such threats and produce a detailed work plan to counter the illicit trafficking of nuclear materials.

Nuclear security has received greater attention since ...


http://english.people.com.cn/90780/7766512.html
What about DEPLETED URANIUM..... Bennyboy Mar 2012 #1
Yup, just go read about the health problems in Fallujah Iraq today madokie Mar 2012 #2
Fallujah babies: Under a new kind of siege Bennyboy Mar 2012 #4
Man will grow to rue the day that the nuclear genie was let out of the bottle madokie Mar 2012 #5
Bad History, as always... PamW Mar 2012 #12
DU, white phosporous and who can imagine what other nightmares were unleashed in Fallujah. nt Mnemosyne Mar 2012 #6
Where did you get that number? Because it's completely wrong. TheWraith Mar 2012 #10
Good post. The seriousness of the issue is downplayed by too many. kristopher Mar 2012 #3
BALONEY!!! PamW Mar 2012 #13
Oh great RobertEarl Mar 2012 #7
Don't forget that the Earth is part Uranium, part Thorium txlibdem Mar 2012 #8
Not sure what that has to do with the OP kristopher Mar 2012 #9
Can you say Hijack madokie Mar 2012 #11
Weapons grade Uranium... 57,000 pounds of it come out of each coal plant each year txlibdem Mar 2012 #14
Courtesy of Oak Ridge National Laboratory. PamW Mar 2012 #15
Why do you continue to spread what you know is deliberate nuclear industry propaganda? kristopher Mar 2012 #16
False and you know it txlibdem Mar 2012 #17
EXACTLY PamW Mar 2012 #18
You claim "scientific acumen" when you can't read for basic comprehension? kristopher Mar 2012 #19
favorite tactic to lie - data trimming. txlibdem Mar 2012 #21
Your reading skills... kristopher Mar 2012 #22
Ad hominem not accepted txlibdem Mar 2012 #23
Perhaps PITY is in order PamW Mar 2012 #25
I pity those who are gullible enough to be fooled by people like Kris txlibdem Mar 2012 #29
Additionally... PamW Apr 2012 #36
WRONG AS ALWAYS!! PamW Mar 2012 #24
Dishonesty!!! PamW Mar 2012 #26
Wow. There must have been lots of nuclear wars then. NNadir Mar 2012 #20
As far as I can tell, the OP concerns the possibility that significant quantities of HEU struggle4progress Mar 2012 #27
Thank you for the clarification. kristopher Mar 2012 #28
Interview with Matthew Bunn from Harvard's Managing the Atom Project kristopher Mar 2012 #30
Non Sequitur - what does this have to do with nuclear power PamW Apr 2012 #31
It is now a given that you have trouble with reading comprehension kristopher Apr 2012 #32
The other way around... PamW Apr 2012 #33
How long are you going to pretend that enrichment isn't a right of reactor ownership? kristopher Apr 2012 #34
WRONG AS ALWAYS!! PamW Apr 2012 #35
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»"There is more (weap...»Reply #3